100 Southern Boulevard, Nesconset, NY 11767 (opens Google Maps) · Suffolk County · (631) 361-8800· 240 certified beds · avg 236 residents/day · certified since Aug 6, 1984 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: CARERITE CENTERS (34 facilities, chain avg rating 3.6★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Sep 8, 2023 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Oct 11, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Apr 5, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: May 2, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 13 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. F-0686
The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. F-0694
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. F-0695
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Feb 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · F-0694 |
| Feb 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Apr 5, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Nov 22, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Nov 22, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Nov 22, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Nov 22, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility admitted a resident without a doctor's order, or did not make sure each resident stayed under a doctor's ongoing care. · from a complaint · F-0710 |
| Sep 8, 2023 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Jul 22, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Jul 22, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · F-0676 |
| Jul 22, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Jul 22, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (4 → 3).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 4 | 0 | D |
| 2023 | 5 | 1 | J ▲ |
| 2024 | 1 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 3 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
2 fines totaling $92,770.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2024 | Fine | $43,610 |
| Sep 8, 2023 | Fine | $49,160 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New York avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.87 | 3.58 | 3.95 | bottom 17% in New York; bottom 10% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.41 | 0.68 | 0.69 | bottom 16% in New York; bottom 23% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.45 | 3.13 | 3.50 | bottom 11% in New York; bottom 8% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.24 | 0.48 | 0.48 | bottom 25% in New York; bottom 20% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 31.0 | 40.3 | 45.8 | top 31% in New York; top 16% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 31.3 | 39.8 | 42.9 | top 34% in New York; top 32% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.39, RN 0.48, weekend 2.89.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.39 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for The Hamlet Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center at. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Einhorn, Neal | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 44% | 08/22/2017 |
| Friedman, Mark | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 44% | 08/22/2017 |
| Rudner, Akiva | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 08/22/2017 |
| Sax, Steven | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 08/22/2017 |
| Desire, Nathaniel | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2024 |
| Desire, Nathaniel | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2024 |
| Einhorn, Neal | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/22/2017 |
| Espinal, Santa | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/15/2021 |
| Espinal, Santa | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/15/2021 |
| Friedman, Mark | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/22/2017 |
| Malone, Stephanie | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/16/2020 |
| Malone, Stephanie | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/16/2020 |
| Zucker, Yossie | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/22/2017 |
All 13 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Carerite Centers — 34 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 33 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smithtown Center for Rehabilitation & Nursing Care | 1.7 mi | Smithtown, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Brookside Multicare Nursing Center | 1.9 mi | Smithtown, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| St Catherine of Siena Nursing and Rehabilitation C | 2.0 mi | Smithtown, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| St James Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center | 2.2 mi | St James, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Luxor Nursing & Rehabilitation at Mills Pond | 2.2 mi | St James, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Long Island State Veterans Home | 4.7 mi | Stonybrook, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Jefferson's Ferry | 5.3 mi | South Setauket, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| St Johnland Nursing Center | 5.4 mi | Kings Park, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Ross Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation | 6.3 mi | Brentwood, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Maria Regina Rehabilitation and Nursing | 7.0 mi | Brentwood, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Island Nursing and Rehab Center | 7.2 mi | Holtsville, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Allegria Nursing & Rehab Center of Port Jefferson | 7.2 mi | Port Jefferson Stati, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Suffolk, NY — 41 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335674.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details