New YorkKings Park

St Johnland Nursing Center

395 Sunken Meadow Road, Kings Park, NY 11754 · Suffolk County · 250 certified beds · avg 205 residents/day · certified since Dec 27, 1975

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$30,817
Fines, last 3 years
3.95
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Mar 10, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Apr 17, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 18, 2023 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jul 16, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (21)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 25, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Feb 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Mar 10, 2025▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Dec 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Dec 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Dec 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Dec 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Dec 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Dec 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint
Dec 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Dec 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide each resident with a nourishing, tasty, well-balanced diet that meets their daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
Dec 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · from a complaint
May 18, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
May 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
May 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
May 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
May 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
May 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 13, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 11).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202110D
202361G ▲
2024110E
202511K ▲
202620D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $30,817.

DateTypeAmount / length
Mar 10, 2025Fine$30,817

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew York avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.953.583.95top 27% in New York; top 41% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.730.680.69top 29% in New York; top 34% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.583.133.50top 22% in New York; top 39% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.480.480.48top 30% in New York; top 35% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)39.040.345.8bottom 48% in New York; top 34% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)48.839.842.9bottom 28% in New York; bottom 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.14, RN 0.76, weekend 3.75. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Agnes, MichaelIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/31/2020
Conway, MarionIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/31/2020
Deming, DavidIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/31/2020
Doerge, CarlIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/23/1998
Faynzilbert, YelenaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2021
Faynzilbert, YelenaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/24/2025
Lane, HeatherIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/31/2020
Santangelo, JosephIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/31/2020
Santangelo, JosephIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/31/2020
Tretola, MichaelIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/11/2023
Tretola, MichaelIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/11/2023
Tretola, MichaelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/12/2025
Vermylen, ArleneIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/31/2020

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
St Catherine of Siena Nursing and Rehabilitation C3.8 miSmithtown, NY★★★☆☆3/5
Brookside Multicare Nursing Center3.9 miSmithtown, NY★★★★★4/5
Smithtown Center for Rehabilitation & Nursing Care4.0 miSmithtown, NY★★☆☆☆3/5
St James Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center5.2 miSt James, NY★★★★☆3/5
Luxor Nursing & Rehabilitation at Mills Pond5.2 miSt James, NY★★★★★4/5
The Hamlet Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center at5.4 miNesconset, NY★★★★★4/5
Gurwin Jewish Nursing and Rehabilitation Center6.0 miCommack, NY★★★★★4/5
Long Island State Veterans Home6.7 miStonybrook, NY★★★★★5/5
Ross Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation8.2 miBrentwood, NY★★★☆☆2/5
Jefferson's Ferry8.3 miSouth Setauket, NY★★★★★5/5
Carillon Nursing and Rehabilitation Center8.4 miHuntington, NY★★★★☆3/5
Maria Regina Rehabilitation and Nursing8.8 miBrentwood, NY★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Kings Park →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335487.