Village Green Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center
23 Fair Street, Bristol, CT 06010 · Naugatuck Vly County · 120 certified beds · avg 75 residents/day · certified since Oct 1, 1971
Part of chain: ATLAS HEALTHCARE (29 facilities, chain avg rating 3.6★)
2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$22,411
Fines, last 3 years
3.32
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 12, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Apr 21, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jul 8, 2024 · F-0805 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems.
Why it matters: Food served in the wrong texture can cause choking or lead residents to stop eating and lose weight.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Jun 12, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)
All citations in the current public record (38)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint |
| Mar 12, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Mar 12, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. |
| Mar 12, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. |
| Mar 12, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. |
| Mar 12, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. |
| Mar 12, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint |
| Mar 12, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Mar 12, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. |
| Mar 12, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| Mar 12, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. |
| Mar 12, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. |
| Mar 12, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Mar 12, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. |
| Mar 12, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. |
| Mar 7, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint |
| Jan 22, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint |
| Nov 20, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint |
| Nov 20, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint |
| Sep 24, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint |
| Sep 24, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint |
| Sep 24, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint |
| Jul 8, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems. · from a complaint |
| Feb 21, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Mar 1, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. |
| Mar 1, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Mar 1, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. |
| Mar 1, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. |
| Mar 1, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Mar 1, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. |
| Mar 1, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. |
| Mar 1, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Mar 1, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Mar 1, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. |
| Mar 1, 2023 | B · Minimal risk, repeated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. |
| Mar 1, 2023 | B · Minimal risk, repeated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. |
| Jul 2, 2021 | B · Minimal risk, repeated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. |
| Jul 2, 2021 | B · Minimal risk, repeated | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (12 → 14).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2 | 0 | B |
| 2023 | 12 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 7 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 16 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
2 fines totaling $22,411.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2025 | Fine | $14,393 |
| Jul 8, 2024 | Fine | $8,018 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Connecticut avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.32 | 3.80 | 3.95 | bottom 23% in Connecticut; bottom 27% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.77 | 0.70 | 0.69 | top 29% in Connecticut; top 30% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.00 | 3.43 | 3.50 | bottom 22% in Connecticut; bottom 31% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.68 | 0.46 | 0.48 | top 15% in Connecticut; top 17% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 45.2 | 37.4 | 45.8 | bottom 20% in Connecticut; bottom 49% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 14.3 | 38.6 | 42.9 | top 10% in Connecticut; top 7% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.08, RN 0.94, weekend 3.69. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bristol SNF Operations Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 02/27/2025 |
| Gottlieb, Moshe | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/27/2025 |
| HB Bristol Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 8% | 02/27/2025 |
| Hirsch, Hadassa | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 8% | 02/27/2025 |
| LS Bristol Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 8% | 02/27/2025 |
| SG Bristol Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 8% | 02/27/2025 |
| Sonnenschein, Leah | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 8% | 02/27/2025 |
| Tauber, Shaindy | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 8% | 02/27/2025 |
| Bak, Pinchos | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/27/2025 |
| Bauer, Shannon | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/27/2025 |
| Bristol Opco Manager LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/27/2025 |
| Bristol SNF Realty Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/27/2025 |
| Bristol SNF Realty LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/15/2025 |
| Gottlieb, Moshe | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/27/2025 |
| Gottlieb, Moshe | Individual | Limited Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/27/2025 |
| Gottlieb, Moshe | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/27/2025 |
| HB Bristol Holdings LLC | Organization | Limited Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/27/2025 |
| Hirsch, Hadassa | Individual | Limited Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/27/2025 |
| JMH Family LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/27/2025 |
| JMH Family Trust | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/27/2025 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How do you handle residents who need modified food textures, and how do you make those meals appetizing?"
- "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
- "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "What does the care plan for a brand-new resident cover in the first 48 hours, and who writes it?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Civita Care Sheriden Woods | 0.9 mi | Bristol, CT | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Pines at Bristol for Nursing & Rehabilitation, the | 2.0 mi | Bristol, CT | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Ingraham Manor Rehab and Nursing | 2.3 mi | Bristol, CT | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Apple Rehab Farmington Valley | 2.6 mi | Plainville, CT | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Jerome Home | 5.3 mi | New Britain, CT | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Monsignor Bojnowski Manor, INC | 5.4 mi | New Britain, CT | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Southington Care Center | 6.0 mi | Southington, CT | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Summit at Plantsville Center for Health & Rehabili | 6.1 mi | Plantsville, CT | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Grandview Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 6.2 mi | New Britain, CT | —/5 | abuseSFF | |
| Amberwoods of Farmington | 6.6 mi | Farmington, CT | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Avon Health Center | 6.8 mi | Avon, CT | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Apple Rehab Avon | 7.0 mi | Avon, CT | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 075198.