New HampshireNorth Conway

Mineral Springs

1251 White Mountain Highway, North Conway, NH 03860 · Carroll County · 87 certified beds · avg 73 residents/day · certified since Feb 12, 1997 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: 603 HEALTHCARE (7 facilities, chain avg rating 3.6★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$32,148
Fines, last 3 years
4.11
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · May 30, 2024 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: May 2, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (27)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Aug 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Feb 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Feb 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Feb 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Feb 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
Feb 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Sep 12, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Sep 12, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 12, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Sep 12, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's activities program was not run by a qualified professional. The person directing recreation and social activities must have proper training or credentials.
Sep 12, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program.
Sep 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Sep 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Sep 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
Sep 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Sep 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Sep 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Sep 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Sep 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Sep 12, 2024C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them.
May 30, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Feb 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint
Nov 8, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Nov 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Nov 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Nov 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 1).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202340E
2024161J ▲
202570D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $32,148.

DateTypeAmount / length
May 30, 2024Fine$16,801
Sep 13, 2023Fine$15,347

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew Hampshire avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.114.113.95top 43% in New Hampshire; top 35% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.950.820.69top 26% in New Hampshire; top 18% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.753.673.50top 40% in New Hampshire; top 31% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.610.550.48top 29% in New Hampshire; top 22% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)40.044.145.8top 35% in New Hampshire; top 36% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)15.440.942.9top 6% in New Hampshire; top 9% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.05, RN 0.94, weekend 3.70. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Black Mountain Peak Healthcare, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%01/25/2024
PR NH Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest48%02/19/2024
RR NH Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest48%02/19/2024
603 Healthcare LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/28/2024
603 Healthcare LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/28/2024
Hernandez, AmandaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2024
Hernandez, AmandaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2024
Martin, ChrisIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/04/2024
Martin, ChrisIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/04/2024
Stevenson, SeanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/29/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Mountain View Community22.7 miOssipee, NH★★★★☆4/5
Wolfeboro Bay Center30.5 miWolfeboro, NH★★★★☆4/5
Norway Center for Health & Rehabilitation, LLC31.7 miNorway, ME★★★★★4/5
Coos County Nursing Home32.2 miBerlin, NH★★☆☆☆2/5
Market Square Health Care Center, LLC33.1 miSouth Paris, ME★☆☆☆☆1/5
Saint Vincent Rehabilitation & Nursing Center33.4 miBerlin, NH★☆☆☆☆1/5
Maine Veterans Home - So Paris33.4 miSouth Paris, ME★★★★★5/5
Golden View Health Care Center34.0 miMeredith, NH★★★★☆3/5
Lafayette Center35.2 miFranconia, NH★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Morrison Nursing Home35.3 miWhitefield, NH★★★★☆4/5
Ledgewood Manor36.3 miWindham, ME★★★☆☆3/5
Belknap County Nursing Home37.3 miLaconia, NH★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in North Conway →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 305084.