How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
8622 Line Avenue, Shreveport, LA 71106 (opens Google Maps) · Caddo County · (318) 868-4126· 160 certified beds · avg 120 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 1995 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: PRIORITY MANAGEMENT (38 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 14 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656
The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. F-0658
The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. F-0677
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Dec 3, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Dec 3, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Dec 3, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Dec 3, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Sep 25, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Sep 25, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. · F-0851 |
| Jun 5, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686 |
| Jun 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Jun 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint · F-0697 |
| Aug 9, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Aug 9, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · F-0725 |
| Aug 9, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint · F-0726 |
| Aug 9, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months. · F-0868 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 5).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 5 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 5 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Louisiana avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.42 | 4.04 | 3.95 | bottom 23% in Louisiana; bottom 32% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.28 | 0.32 | 0.69 | top 47% in Louisiana; bottom 7% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.84 | 3.45 | 3.50 | bottom 18% in Louisiana; bottom 22% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.23 | 0.20 | 0.48 | top 17% in Louisiana; bottom 17% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 55.4 | 47.6 | 45.8 | bottom 26% in Louisiana; bottom 24% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 0.0 | 41.6 | 42.9 | top 1% in Louisiana; top 1% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.52, RN 0.28, weekend 2.92.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.52 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Spring Lake Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bauder, William | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2019 |
| Boulware, Douglas | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2019 |
| Boulware, Steven | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2019 |
| SDB Holdings | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 04/01/2019 |
| Bauder, William | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2019 |
| Boulware, Steven | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2019 |
| Colvin, David | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/02/2025 |
| Greggs, Latonya | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/26/2021 |
| Lebon, Charles | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/18/2025 |
| Priority Management Group, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2019 |
| Priority Management Group, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/02/2025 |
| Progressive Rehab Solutions, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2019 |
All 12 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Priority Management — 38 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 37 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Booker T. Washington Skilled Nursing and Rehabilit | 0.9 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★★☆☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Garden Park Nursing & Rehab Ctr, LLC | 1.5 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Village Health Care at the Glen | 2.0 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Pierremont Healthcare Center | 2.1 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Live Oak | 2.4 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Heritage Manor of Stratmore Nursing & Rehab Ctr | 2.5 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| The Bradford Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation | 3.5 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Southern Hills Healthcare and Rehabilitation | 3.5 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Magnolia Manor Nursing and Rehab Ctr, LLC | 3.9 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Claiborne Healthcare Center | 4.0 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Guest House Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation | 4.2 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Roseview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 4.3 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Caddo, LA — 22 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 195344.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details