1417 Brace Road, Cherry Hill, NJ 08034 (opens Google Maps) · Camden County · (856) 795-3131· 256 certified beds · avg 140 residents/day · certified since Jun 1, 1989 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: BENJAMIN LANDA (48 facilities, chain avg rating 3.4★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Oct 21, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Nov 25, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Feb 4, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 31, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 22 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Oct 21, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jun 12, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jun 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Jun 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Jun 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Dec 23, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Dec 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Dec 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jun 5, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jun 5, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Jun 5, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jun 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Jun 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Jun 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Jun 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Jun 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Jun 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jun 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jun 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| Jun 5, 2024 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility was not properly licensed, or did not operate in compliance with federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and accepted professional standards. · F-0836 |
| Dec 12, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 4).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 15 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 5 | 1 | J ▲ |
| 2026 | 1 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
2 fines totaling $81,247.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2026 | Fine | $71,995 |
| Oct 21, 2025 | Fine | $9,252 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New Jersey avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.44 | 3.88 | 3.95 | top 19% in New Jersey; top 25% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.82 | 0.67 | 0.69 | top 23% in New Jersey; top 26% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.98 | 3.53 | 3.50 | top 19% in New Jersey; top 23% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.54 | 0.50 | 0.48 | top 30% in New Jersey; top 29% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 46.0 | 39.7 | 45.8 | bottom 30% in New Jersey; bottom 47% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 25.9 | 37.7 | 42.9 | top 29% in New Jersey; top 23% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.27, RN 0.79, weekend 3.83.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.27 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Silver Healthcare Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gottlieb, Anne | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
| Klahr, Moshe | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
| Landa, Benjamin | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
| Lowy, Brenda | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
| Lowy, Jerry | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
| Marina CH, LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
| MTC Family, LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
| Philipson Family Limited Liability Company, LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
| Philipson, Bent | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
| Shtern, Sharon | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
| Strauss, Joseph | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
| Treff, Esther | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
| Treff, Mindy | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
| Treff, Mordechai | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
| Treff, Shaindy | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
| Conti, Joseph | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
| Conti, Joseph | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
| Fox, Darren | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/20/2024 |
| Fox, Darren | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/20/2024 |
| Landa, Benjamin | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
Showing 20 of 24 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 4 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Benjamin Landa — 48 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 47 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barclays Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 1.8 mi | Cherry Hill, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Dwellside Care and Rehab | 2.5 mi | Cherry Hill, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| St Mary's Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare | 2.8 mi | Cherry Hill, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Premier Cadbury of Cherry Hill | 2.9 mi | Cherry Hill, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Aristacare at Cherry Hill | 3.3 mi | Cherry Hill, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Laurel Brook Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 3.4 mi | Mount Laurel, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| United Methodist Communities at Collingswood | 3.6 mi | Collingswood, NJ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| River Front Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 3.6 mi | Pennsauken, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Palace Rehabilitation and Care Center, the | 3.6 mi | Maple Shade, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Echelon Care & Rehab | 4.0 mi | Voorhees, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Voorhees Pediatric Facility | 4.0 mi | Voorhees, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Lions Gate | 4.0 mi | Voorhees, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Camden, NJ — 21 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315280.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details