How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Pinnacle Multicare Nursing and Rehabilitation Cent
801 Co-Op City Boulevardd, Bronx, NY 10475 (opens Google Maps) · Bronx County · (718) 239-6500· 480 certified beds · avg 468 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1977 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: BENJAMIN LANDA (48 facilities, chain avg rating 3.4★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Aug 4, 2025
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Aug 4, 2025
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.37
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Aug 4, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Aug 4, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Sep 26, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 20 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. F-0695
The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. F-0609
View all 20 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Aug 4, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Aug 4, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Aug 4, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · F-0694 |
| Aug 4, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| Jan 6, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Jan 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Jun 8, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
| Jun 8, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jul 23, 2021 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jul 23, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly hold, secure, and manage residents' personal money that was deposited with it for safekeeping. Facilities holding residents' funds must keep careful, honest accounts. · F-0568 |
| Jul 23, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580 |
| Jul 23, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Jul 23, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · F-0604 |
| Jul 23, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Jul 23, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jul 23, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Jul 23, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Jul 23, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921 |
| Jul 23, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · F-0925 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 5).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2021
All citations: 11
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 1
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 11 | 0 | F |
| 2023 | 2 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 7 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityNew York averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.37
New York average: 3.58
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.71
New York average: 0.68
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.93
New York average: 3.13
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New York avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.37 | 3.58 | 3.95 | bottom 47% in New York; bottom 30% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.69 | top 31% in New York; top 35% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.93 | 3.13 | 3.50 | bottom 48% in New York; bottom 27% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.37 | 0.48 | 0.48 | top 48% in New York; bottom 47% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 28.3 | 40.3 | 45.8 | top 23% in New York; top 11% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 22.8 | 39.8 | 42.9 | top 15% in New York; top 18% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.86, RN 0.60, weekend 2.49.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (2.86 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Pinnacle Multicare Nursing and Rehabilitation Cent. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Partnership
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lerner, Chana | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 5% | 12/22/2005 |
| Philipson, Bent | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 38% | 07/01/2007 |
| Rubinstein, Berish | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2017 |
| Tessler, Naomi | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 5% | 02/07/2018 |
| Fall, Cheikh | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2023 |
| Fall, Cheikh | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2023 |
| Fischel, Mayer | Individual | General Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2017 |
| Grinspan, Eli | Individual | General Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2017 |
| Rhee, Charlton | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2023 |
| Rhee, Charlton | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2023 |
| Santiago, Debbie | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2023 |
| Saxena, Amit | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Singh, Nitika | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/20/2019 |
| Singh, Nitika | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/20/2019 |
| White-Fraser, Graceann | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2023 |
All 15 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Benjamin Landa — 48 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Premier Nursing and Rehab Center of Far Rockaway — Far Rockaway, NY · overall 3/5
- Rockville Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, — Rockville Center, NY · overall 5/5
- Spring Creek Rehabilitation & Nursing Care Center — Brooklyn, NY · overall 4/5
- The Five Towns Premier Rehabilitation & Nursing Ce — Woodmere, NY · overall 2/5
- Arcadia Health and Rehabilitation Center — Pensacola, FL · overall 5/5
- Bay Breeze Rehabilitation by Harborview — Gulf Breeze, FL · overall 3/5
- Bayside Health and Rehabilitation Center — Pensacola, FL · overall 5/5
- Brookwood Gardens Rehabilitation and Nursing Cente — Homestead, FL · overall 2/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 47 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
- "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
- "Who on your staff manages IV therapy, and what training and monitoring is in place?"
- "Could I join residents for a meal to see the food quality and temperature for myself?"
- "If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
- "Can I see where garbage is stored and how often it's removed?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the New York midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 28% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 15 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 260 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regeis Care Center | 0.3 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Workmens Circle Multicare Center | 0.4 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Split Rock Rehabilitation and Health Care Center | 0.6 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Eastchester Rehabilitation and Health Care Center | 1.1 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Kings Harbor Multicare Cente | 1.1 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Laconia Nursing Home | 1.2 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Gold Crest Care Center | 1.3 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| East Haven Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 1.4 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Morris Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 1.7 mi | Bronx, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Pelham Parkway Nursing Care and Rehabilitation Fac | 1.7 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Bronx Park Rehabilitation & Nursing Center | 1.9 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Morningside Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 2.1 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Bronx, NY — 44 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Prestige Nursing Care & Rehab Center — Bronx, NY · overall 2/5
- Rebekah Rehabilitation and Extended Care Center — Bronx, NY · overall 4/5
- Schervier Nursing Care Center — Bronx, NY · overall 4/5
- St Patrick's Home — Bronx, NY · overall 2/5
- St Vincent Depaul Residence — Bronx, NY · overall 3/5
- The Plaza Rehab and Nursing Center — Bronx, NY · overall 5/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335581.