New York ›Purdys

Salem Hills Rehabilitation and Nursing Center

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

539 Route 22, Purdys, NY 10578 (opens Google Maps) · Westchester County · (914) 277-3691· 126 certified beds · avg 124 residents/day · certified since Jul 23, 1987 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: EPIC HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT (5 facilities, chain avg rating 3.4★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected May 16, 2024
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.56
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →

⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 13 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint F-0677

  2. E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern

    The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689

  3. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. F-0550

View all 13 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 28, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677
May 16, 2024E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689
May 16, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550
May 16, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558
May 16, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
May 16, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
May 16, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686
May 16, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688
May 16, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
May 31, 2019D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
May 31, 2019D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657
May 31, 2019D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
May 31, 2019D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756

Inspection trend by year

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2019
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201940D
202480E
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityNew York averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 2.56
New York average: 3.58
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.38
New York average: 0.68
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.39
New York average: 3.13
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityNew York avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.563.583.95bottom 3% in New York; bottom 4% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.380.680.69bottom 10% in New York; bottom 19% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.393.133.50bottom 8% in New York; bottom 7% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.350.480.48bottom 49% in New York; bottom 43% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)17.240.345.8top 3% in New York; top 2% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)16.739.842.9top 6% in New York; top 9% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.70, RN 0.40, weekend 2.52.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (2.70 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Salem Hills Rehabilitation and Nursing Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Jozefovic, HerbertIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest70%10/01/2025
Neuman, MarkIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest20%10/01/2025
Singer, BaruchIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest10%10/01/2025
Anderson, MaritesIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2025
Anderson, MaritesIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2025
Bonilla, MadelynIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2025
Bonilla, MadelynIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2025
Epic Healthcare Management LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2025
Fca Partners LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2025
Feminella, DanielleIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2025
Feminella, DanielleIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2025
HMM & Co., LLPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2025
Jozefovic, HerbertIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2025
Jozefovic, HerbertIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2025
Jozefovic, HerbertIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2025
Jozefovic, YosefIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2025
Kreismann, AriIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2025
Kreismann, AriIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2025
Long Term Solutions, INC.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2025
Maniscalco, VincentIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2025

Showing 20 of 40 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 20 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Epic Healthcare Management — 5 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
  • "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
  • "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
  • "Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
  • "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
  • "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
  • "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
  • "What do you do daily to keep residents moving, and how do you help residents at risk of losing mobility?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the New York midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 17% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 40 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 42 within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Waterview Hills Rehabilitation and Nursing Center0.0 miPurdy Station, NY★★★★☆3/5
The Paramount at Somers Rehab and Nursing Center1.9 miSomers, NY★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Putnam Ridge8.7 miBrewster, NY★☆☆☆☆1/5
Laurel Ridge Center for Health & Rehabilitation9.5 miRidgefield, CT★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Havencare at Filosa10.5 miDanbury, CT★★★★★5/5
North Westchester Restorative Therapy & Nrsg Crt10.6 miMohegan Lake, NY★★★★★4/5
Yorktown Rehabilitation & Nursing Center10.6 miCortlandt Manor, NY★★★★☆3/5
Havencare at Hancock Hall10.6 miDanbury, CT★★★★★5/5
Saint John Paul II Center11.1 miDanbury, CT★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Putnam Nursing & Rehabilitation Center11.3 miHolmes, NY★★☆☆☆2/5
Civita Care Center at Danbury12.2 miDanbury, CT★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Glen Hill12.2 miDanbury, CT★★★★☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Westchester, NY — 42 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Purdys →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335687.

This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details