ConnecticutDanbury

Havencare at Filosa

13 Hakim St, Danbury, CT 06810 · Western Ct County · 64 certified beds · avg 59 residents/day · certified since Jul 10, 1968

5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.45
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (17)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 14, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Aug 7, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Aug 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Aug 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Aug 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Aug 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Aug 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 7, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Aug 7, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Apr 26, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Apr 26, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Apr 26, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Apr 26, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Apr 26, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Apr 26, 2022B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Sep 26, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 26, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 8).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201920E
202260D
202480E
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityConnecticut avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.453.803.95bottom 36% in Connecticut; bottom 34% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.830.700.69top 27% in Connecticut; top 25% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.983.433.50bottom 21% in Connecticut; bottom 30% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.770.460.48top 10% in Connecticut; top 13% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)53.337.445.8bottom 10% in Connecticut; bottom 29% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)33.338.642.9top 36% in Connecticut; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.02, RN 0.97, weekend 3.48. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Danbury Opco LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%09/12/2023
Jek Irrv Tr IIOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest26%09/12/2023
NMJ Irrv Tr IIOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest26%09/12/2023
Jakobovits, NathanIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE09/12/2023
Kagan, JeffreyIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE09/12/2023
Shapiro, YitzchokIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE09/12/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Havencare at Hancock Hall0.2 miDanbury, CT★★★★★5/5
Saint John Paul II Center1.3 miDanbury, CT★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Civita Care Center at Danbury1.7 miDanbury, CT★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Glen Hill1.8 miDanbury, CT★★★★☆3/5
Bethel Health Care Center4.3 miBethel, CT★★★★☆4/5
Laurel Ridge Center for Health & Rehabilitation5.0 miRidgefield, CT★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Putnam Ridge5.9 miBrewster, NY★☆☆☆☆1/5
Ridge Crest at Meadow Ridge9.6 miWest Redding, CT★★★★★4/5
Waterview Hills Rehabilitation and Nursing Center10.5 miPurdy Station, NY★★★★☆3/5
Salem Hills Rehabilitation and Nursing Center10.5 miPurdys, NY★★★★☆3/5
Stone Bridge Center for Health & Rehabilitation10.7 miNewtown, CT★★★★☆3/5
Putnam Nursing & Rehabilitation Center11.9 miHolmes, NY★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Danbury →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 075074.