New YorkMamaroneck

Sarah Neuman Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing

845 Palmer Avenue, Mamaroneck, NY 10543 · Westchester County · 300 certified beds · avg 273 residents/day · certified since Dec 16, 1969

Part of chain: INFINITE CARE (8 facilities, chain avg rating 2.0★)

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$163,020
Fines, last 3 years
2.94
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Oct 23, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jan 29, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, repeated · Jan 30, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (H): Multiple residents were actually harmed by the same failure — a pattern of real harm, not an isolated incident.

Corrected: Mar 24, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (31)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Oct 23, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Oct 23, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · from a complaint
Jun 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Jun 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Mar 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jan 30, 2025▲ H · Actual harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jan 30, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jan 30, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Jan 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Jan 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Jan 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required.
Jan 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Jan 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Jan 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention.
Jan 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint
Jan 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jan 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · from a complaint
Jan 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · from a complaint
Jan 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Jan 30, 2025B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Jan 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jan 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jul 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
May 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Dec 19, 2018E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Dec 19, 2018D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Dec 19, 2018D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Dec 19, 2018D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Dec 19, 2018D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Dec 19, 2018D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.

Inspection trend by year

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201860E
202420D
2025232H ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $163,020.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jan 6, 2025Fine$163,020

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew York avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.943.583.95bottom 22% in New York; bottom 12% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.780.680.69top 24% in New York; top 29% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.663.133.50bottom 28% in New York; bottom 15% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.620.480.48top 21% in New York; top 21% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)38.040.345.8top 49% in New York; top 31% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)30.439.842.9top 30% in New York; top 30% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.22, RN 0.85, weekend 2.91. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Klein, EstherIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest95%08/04/2025
Palmer Avenue SNF Operations Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%08/04/2025
Perez, KathrynIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest5%08/04/2025
845 Palmer Avenue Realty LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/04/2025
Abrams, LaurenceIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/04/2025
Abrams, LaurenceIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/04/2025
Berkowitz, JaredIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/04/2025
Berkowitz, JaredIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/04/2025
Gupta, GayatriIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/04/2025
Gupta, GayatriIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/04/2025
Hogan, TaraIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/04/2025
Hogan, TaraIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/04/2025
Hynes, TamaraIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/04/2025
Klein, EstherIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/04/2025
Marcucci, MirelleIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/04/2025
Marcucci, MirelleIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/04/2025
Myitcrew INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/04/2025
Myitcrew INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/19/2025
National Datacare LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/04/2025
National Datacare LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/19/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
The Osborn2.7 miRye, NY★★★★☆3/5
Sutton Park Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation3.0 miNew Rochelle, NY★★★☆☆3/5
Schaffer Extended Care Center3.1 miNew Rochelle, NY★☆☆☆☆1/5
United Hebrew Geriatric Center3.7 miNew Rochelle, NY★★★★★4/5
Glen Island Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation3.9 miNew Rochelle, NY★★★☆☆3/5
The Wartburg Home4.0 miMount Vernon, NY★★★★☆3/5
Bayberry Nursing Home4.1 miNew Rochelle, NY★★★★☆4/5
Dumont Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing Care4.3 miNew Rochelle, NY★★★☆☆2/5
Westchester Center for Rehabilitation & Nursing4.8 miMount Vernon, NY★★☆☆☆1/5
The Enclave at Rye Rehab and Nursing Ctr4.9 miPort Chester, NY★★★★★4/5
White Plains Center for Nursing Care, L L C5.4 miWhite Plains, NY★★★★★3/5
Sprain Brook Manor Rehab5.7 miScarsdale, NY★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Mamaroneck →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335296.