How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Yorktown Rehabilitation & Nursing Center
2300 Catherine Street, Cortlandt Manor, NY 10567 (opens Google Maps) · Westchester County · (914) 739-2244· 200 certified beds · avg 120 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1967 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: PERSONAL HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT (21 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jan 24, 2024
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Mar 11, 2026
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.77
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Mar 11, 2026 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Mar 11, 2026 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: May 12, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 19 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint F-0641
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
View all 19 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Aug 28, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint · F-0641 |
| Aug 28, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Apr 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Apr 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jan 24, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jan 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents important notices in a format and language they can understand — for example, translated documents or accessible formats for those with vision or hearing loss. · F-0574 |
| Jan 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| Jan 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · F-0919 |
| Jan 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Oct 28, 2020 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Oct 28, 2020 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Oct 28, 2020 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Oct 28, 2020 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Oct 28, 2020 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · F-0908 |
| Oct 28, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Oct 28, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Oct 28, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility admitted a resident without a doctor's order, or did not make sure each resident stayed under a doctor's ongoing care. · F-0710 |
| Oct 5, 2018 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 4).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2018
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2020
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 1
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 1 | 0 | B |
| 2020 | 8 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 7 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 1 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityNew York averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.77
New York average: 3.58
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.65
New York average: 0.68
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.12
New York average: 3.13
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New York avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.77 | 3.58 | 3.95 | top 34% in New York; top 50% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.69 | top 38% in New York; top 42% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.12 | 3.13 | 3.50 | top 42% in New York; bottom 37% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.30 | 0.48 | 0.48 | bottom 39% in New York; bottom 32% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 33.0 | 40.3 | 45.8 | top 36% in New York; top 20% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 28.6 | 39.8 | 42.9 | top 26% in New York; top 26% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.91, RN 0.67, weekend 3.23.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.91 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Yorktown Rehabilitation & Nursing Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barth, Alexander | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 35% | 10/09/2015 |
| Walden, Yehudah | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 15% | 10/09/2015 |
| Zagelbaum, Ephraim | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 29% | 10/09/2015 |
| Zagelbaum, Yechiel | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 21% | 10/09/2015 |
| Barth, Alexander | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/09/2015 |
| Barth, Alexander | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/12/2018 |
| Dolfo, Keala | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/12/2018 |
| Dolfo, Keala | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/12/2018 |
| Joseph, Josmi | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Joseph, Josmi | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/18/2025 |
All 10 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Personal Healthcare Management — 21 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Cambridge Rehabilitation & Nursing Center — Cambridge, MA · overall 4/5
- Medford Rehabilitation and Nursing Center — Medford, MA · overall 3/5
- Rehabilitation & Nursing Center at Everett (the) — Everett, MA · overall 3/5
- Alpine Rehabilitation and Nursing Center — Little Falls, NY · overall 3/5
- Auburn Rehabilitation & Nursing Center — Auburn, NY · overall 2/5
- Delhi Rehabilitation and Nursing Center — Delhi, NY · overall 2/5
- Dunkirk Rehabilitation & Nursing Center — Dunkirk, NY · overall 5/5
- Eden Rehabilitation Nursing Center — Eden, NY · overall 5/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 20 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "How do you communicate important notices to residents who speak another language or have trouble seeing or hearing?"
- "Who reviews your menus, and can I see this week's menu and join my family member for a meal?"
- "Can you show me the call buttons in the bathrooms and bathing areas, and tell me your average response time when one is pressed?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 33% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 46 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Emerald Peek Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 2.3 mi | Peekskill, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| North Westchester Restorative Therapy & Nrsg Crt | 2.7 mi | Mohegan Lake, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Cortlandt Healthcare | 3.5 mi | Cortlandt Manor, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| New York State Veterans Home at Montrose | 4.7 mi | Montrose, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Springvale Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 5.1 mi | Croton on Hudson, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Sky View Rehabilitation & Health Care Center L L C | 5.5 mi | Croton on Hudson, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Sunshine Children's Home and Rehab Center | 6.1 mi | Ossining, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Cedar Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 7.5 mi | Ossining, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Bethel Nursing Home Company INC | 7.6 mi | Ossining, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Northern Riverview Health Care, INC | 8.3 mi | Haverstraw, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Helen Hayes Hospital R H C F | 8.7 mi | West Haverstraw, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Helen Hayes Hospital T C U | 8.7 mi | West Haverstraw, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Westchester, NY — 42 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Adira at Riverside Rehabilitation and Nursing — Yonkers, NY · overall 2/5
- Andrus on Hudson — Hastings on Hudson, NY · overall 4/5
- Bayberry Nursing Home — New Rochelle, NY · overall 4/5
- Briarcliff Manor Center for Rehab and Nursing Care — Briarcliff Manor, NY · overall 1/5
- Dumont Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing Care — New Rochelle, NY · overall 3/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335078.