New YorkCroton on Hudson

Sky View Rehabilitation & Health Care Center L L C

1280 Albany Post Rd, Croton on Hudson, NY 10520 · Westchester County · 192 certified beds · avg 175 residents/day · certified since May 1, 1976

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.02
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Oct 10, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Dec 5, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (12)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 3, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Mar 3, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required.
Mar 3, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Mar 3, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Mar 3, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Oct 10, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 2, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Dec 19, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Dec 19, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Dec 19, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Dec 19, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201940D
202320E
202511G ▲
202650E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew York avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.023.583.95bottom 27% in New York; bottom 14% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.510.680.69bottom 39% in New York; bottom 40% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.753.133.50bottom 33% in New York; bottom 18% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.420.480.48top 37% in New York; top 44% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)25.040.345.8top 14% in New York; top 7% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)26.339.842.9top 22% in New York; top 23% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.03, RN 0.52, weekend 2.76. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Partnership

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Brach, SamuelIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest10%10/16/2003
Fagenson, RobertIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest10%10/16/2003
Jozefovic, HerbertIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest25%10/16/2003
Michael T Stynes EstateOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest10%03/28/2023
Neuman, MarkIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest25%10/16/2003
Brach, SamuelIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/16/2003
Fagenson, RobertIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/16/2003
Jozefovic, HerbertIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE10/16/2003
Jozefovic, HerbertIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/16/2003
Neuman, GeraldIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/16/2003
Neuman, MarkIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/16/2003

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Springvale Nursing & Rehabilitation Center1.5 miCroton on Hudson, NY★★★☆☆2/5
New York State Veterans Home at Montrose2.3 miMontrose, NY★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Northern Riverview Health Care, INC3.1 miHaverstraw, NY★★☆☆☆1/5
Sunshine Children's Home and Rehab Center3.3 miOssining, NY★★★★★5/5
Cedar Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center3.6 miOssining, NY★★☆☆☆2/5
Helen Hayes Hospital R H C F4.1 miWest Haverstraw, NY★★★★★5/5
Helen Hayes Hospital T C U4.1 miWest Haverstraw, NY★★★★★5/5
Bethel Nursing Home Company INC4.4 miOssining, NY★★★☆☆2/5
Yorktown Rehabilitation & Nursing Center5.5 miCortlandt Manor, NY★★★★☆3/5
The Emerald Peek Rehabilitation and Nursing Center5.7 miPeekskill, NY★★★☆☆2/5
Tolstoy Foundation Rehabilitation and Nrsg Center6.4 miValley Cottage, NY★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Cortlandt Healthcare6.7 miCortlandt Manor, NY★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Croton on Hudson →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335508.