How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
1280 Albany Post Rd, Croton on Hudson, NY 10520 (opens Google Maps) · Westchester County · (914) 271-5151· 192 certified beds · avg 175 residents/day · certified since May 1, 1976 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Oct 10, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Dec 5, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 12 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. F-0584
The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. F-0730
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. F-0550
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Mar 3, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · F-0730 |
| Mar 3, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Mar 3, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Mar 3, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Oct 10, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Nov 2, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Nov 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Dec 19, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Dec 19, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Dec 19, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Dec 19, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 5).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 4 | 0 | D |
| 2023 | 2 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 1 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 5 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New York avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.02 | 3.58 | 3.95 | bottom 27% in New York; bottom 14% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.51 | 0.68 | 0.69 | bottom 39% in New York; bottom 40% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.75 | 3.13 | 3.50 | bottom 33% in New York; bottom 18% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.42 | 0.48 | 0.48 | top 37% in New York; top 44% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 25.0 | 40.3 | 45.8 | top 14% in New York; top 7% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 26.3 | 39.8 | 42.9 | top 22% in New York; top 23% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.03, RN 0.52, weekend 2.76.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.03 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Sky View Rehabilitation & Health Care Center L L C. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Partnership
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brach, Samuel | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 10% | 10/16/2003 |
| Fagenson, Robert | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 10% | 10/16/2003 |
| Jozefovic, Herbert | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 25% | 10/16/2003 |
| Michael T Stynes Estate | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 10% | 03/28/2023 |
| Neuman, Mark | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 25% | 10/16/2003 |
| Brach, Samuel | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/16/2003 |
| Fagenson, Robert | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/16/2003 |
| Jozefovic, Herbert | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/16/2003 |
| Jozefovic, Herbert | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/16/2003 |
| Neuman, Gerald | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/16/2003 |
| Neuman, Mark | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/16/2003 |
All 11 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Springvale Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 1.5 mi | Croton on Hudson, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| New York State Veterans Home at Montrose | 2.3 mi | Montrose, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Northern Riverview Health Care, INC | 3.1 mi | Haverstraw, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Sunshine Children's Home and Rehab Center | 3.3 mi | Ossining, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Cedar Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 3.6 mi | Ossining, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Helen Hayes Hospital R H C F | 4.1 mi | West Haverstraw, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Helen Hayes Hospital T C U | 4.1 mi | West Haverstraw, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Bethel Nursing Home Company INC | 4.4 mi | Ossining, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Yorktown Rehabilitation & Nursing Center | 5.5 mi | Cortlandt Manor, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Emerald Peek Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 5.7 mi | Peekskill, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Tolstoy Foundation Rehabilitation and Nrsg Center | 6.4 mi | Valley Cottage, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Cortlandt Healthcare | 6.7 mi | Cortlandt Manor, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Westchester, NY — 42 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335508.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details