16 Guion Place, New Rochelle, NY 10802 (opens Google Maps) · Westchester County · (914) 637-1200· 150 certified beds · avg 141 residents/day · certified since Nov 1, 1971 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · May 6, 2025 · F-0686
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jul 2, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 24 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. F-0686
The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. F-0730
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| May 6, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · F-0730 |
| May 6, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| May 6, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| May 6, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| May 6, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · from a complaint · F-0919 |
| May 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| May 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · F-0637 |
| May 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| May 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| May 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems. · F-0805 |
| May 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Dec 20, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Dec 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Dec 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly plan a resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs after leaving. · F-0660 |
| Dec 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Dec 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Dec 20, 2023 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition. · F-0638 |
| Oct 24, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Oct 24, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | When a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care. · F-0661 |
| Oct 24, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Oct 24, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Oct 24, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Oct 24, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience. · F-0744 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 11).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 6 | 0 | D |
| 2023 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 12 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $10,512.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2025 | Fine | $10,512 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New York avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.38 | 3.58 | 3.95 | bottom 48% in New York; bottom 30% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.75 | 0.68 | 0.69 | top 27% in New York; top 32% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.96 | 3.13 | 3.50 | bottom 49% in New York; bottom 29% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.53 | 0.48 | 0.48 | top 27% in New York; top 29% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 97.8 | 40.3 | 45.8 | bottom 1% in New York; bottom 1% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 100.0 | 39.8 | 42.9 | bottom 1% in New York; bottom 1% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.05, RN 0.67, weekend 2.67.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.05 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Schaffer Extended Care Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abramson, Jay | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| Blattman, Barry | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/16/2014 |
| Blye, Colleen | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/06/2016 |
| Blye, Colleen | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/06/2016 |
| Braun, Joel | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| Breslow, Ellen | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/24/2021 |
| Butler, James | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Butler, James | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/14/2016 |
| Ceriale, Melissa | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| Chirico, Emanuel | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/18/2016 |
| Doctoroff, Alisa | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/21/2017 |
| Eisenberg, Douglas | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/24/2020 |
| Emil, Jennie | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| Gantcher, Nathan | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| Gottesman, Ruth | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| Green, Patricia | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| Gutfreund, John | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/21/2017 |
| Harrison, Thomas | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| Heffer, John | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| Henkind, Lewis | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
Showing 20 of 43 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 23 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sutton Park Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation | 0.1 mi | New Rochelle, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| United Hebrew Geriatric Center | 1.2 mi | New Rochelle, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Glen Island Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation | 1.3 mi | New Rochelle, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Wartburg Home | 1.4 mi | Mount Vernon, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Bayberry Nursing Home | 1.4 mi | New Rochelle, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Dumont Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing Care | 1.6 mi | New Rochelle, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Westchester Center for Rehabilitation & Nursing | 2.0 mi | Mount Vernon, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Sarah Neuman Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing | 3.1 mi | Mamaroneck, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Pinnacle Multicare Nursing and Rehabilitation Cent | 3.4 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Split Rock Rehabilitation and Health Care Center | 3.5 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Regeis Care Center | 3.6 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Laconia Nursing Home | 3.6 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Westchester, NY — 42 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335337.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details