2700 Roal Commons Lane, Matthews, NC 28105 (opens Google Maps) · Mecklenburg County · (704) 849-6990· 169 certified beds · avg 143 residents/day · certified since Jan 4, 1967 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: LIBERTY SENIOR LIVING (37 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Mar 25, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Feb 17, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Dec 5, 2025 · F-0690 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Why it matters: Poor continence and catheter care leads to infections, skin breakdown, and loss of dignity.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Dec 16, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, pattern · Mar 25, 2024 · F-0679 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Why it matters: Without engaging activities, residents can become bored, isolated, and depressed, and decline faster.
Severity (H): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was a pattern: more than a limited occurrence, without being widespread. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Apr 11, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Mar 25, 2024 · F-0687 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide proper foot care for residents. Foot care includes routine care like nail trimming and attention to foot problems, which matter greatly for older adults.
Why it matters: Neglected feet can develop painful sores and infections, especially dangerous for residents with diabetes.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Apr 11, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 25 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint F-0690
The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint F-0755
The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint F-0804
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint · F-0690 |
| Dec 5, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755 |
| Dec 5, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint · F-0804 |
| Dec 5, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Dec 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Dec 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · from a complaint · F-0759 |
| Dec 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · from a complaint · F-0806 |
| Dec 5, 2025 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Aug 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| Aug 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jun 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint · F-0602 |
| Mar 25, 2024 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Mar 25, 2024 | ▲ H · Actual harm, pattern | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · from a complaint · F-0679 |
| Mar 25, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper foot care for residents. Foot care includes routine care like nail trimming and attention to foot problems, which matter greatly for older adults. · from a complaint · F-0687 |
| Mar 25, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint · F-0804 |
| Mar 25, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · from a complaint · F-0867 |
| Mar 25, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Mar 25, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide special eating equipment and utensils — like adaptive cups or easy-grip silverware — for residents who need them, along with appropriate help at meals. · from a complaint · F-0810 |
| Oct 4, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint · F-0760 |
| Oct 4, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755 |
| Mar 10, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| Mar 10, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Mar 10, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · F-0867 |
| Mar 10, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Mar 10, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 8).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 7 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 10 | 3 | J ▲ |
| 2025 | 8 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
2 fines totaling $39,811.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2025 | Fine | $23,010 |
| Mar 25, 2024 | Fine | $16,801 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | North Carolina avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.42 | 4.01 | 3.95 | bottom 30% in North Carolina; bottom 32% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.36 | 0.64 | 0.69 | bottom 18% in North Carolina; bottom 16% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.05 | 3.56 | 3.50 | bottom 33% in North Carolina; bottom 34% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.22 | 0.41 | 0.48 | bottom 23% in North Carolina; bottom 15% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 46.2 | 49.0 | 45.8 | top 44% in North Carolina; bottom 47% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 30.8 | 45.7 | 42.9 | top 25% in North Carolina; top 30% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.47, RN 0.37, weekend 3.10.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.47 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Royal Park Rehabilitation & Health Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| John a McNeill Jr 2012 Irrv Tr | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
| Liberty Healthcare Group LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
| Liberty Real Properties, LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
| Long Term Care Management Services LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 03/10/2011 |
| Ronald B. and Cynthia J. McNeill 2013 Irrevocable Trust | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
| Calcutt, Joseph | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
| Calcutt, Joseph | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
| Clements, Thad | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
| Clements, Thad | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/05/2025 |
| James, Nicola | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
| James, Nicola | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/04/2025 |
| John a McNeill Jr 2012 Irrv Tr | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
| Liberty Healthcare Group LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/29/2025 |
| Liberty Real Properties, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
| McNeill, John | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/23/2006 |
| McNeill, John | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/10/2011 |
| McNeill, Robert | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
| McNeill, Ronald | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/23/2006 |
| McNeill, Ronald | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/10/2011 |
| Miller, Robert | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
Showing 20 of 28 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 8 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Liberty Senior Living — 37 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 36 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Willowbrooke Court SC Ctr at Matthews Glen | 0.0 mi | Matthews, NC | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Matthews Health & Rehab Center | 2.1 mi | Matthews, NC | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Lake Park Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 4.2 mi | Indian Trail, NC | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Brookdale Carriage Club Providence | 5.3 mi | Charlotte, NC | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Sardis Oaks | 6.3 mi | Charlotte, NC | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Redwood Health & Rehab | 6.8 mi | Charlotte, NC | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| White Oak Manor - Charlotte | 7.0 mi | Charlotte, NC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Pelican Health Randolph LLC | 7.1 mi | Charlotte, NC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Wilora Lake Healthcare | 7.3 mi | Charlotte, NC | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Clear Creek Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 7.5 mi | Mint Hill, NC | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Sharon at Southpark | 8.2 mi | Charlotte, NC | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Briar Creek Health Center | 8.6 mi | Charlotte, NC | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Mecklenburg, NC — 29 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 345026.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details