North CarolinaWinston-Salem

The Oaks

901 Bethesda Road, Winston-Salem, NC 27103 · Forsyth County · 131 certified beds · avg 120 residents/day · certified since Jun 30, 1988

Part of chain: LIBERTY SENIOR LIVING (37 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.63
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (24)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Aug 22, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service.
Aug 22, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Aug 22, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Aug 22, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records.
Aug 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Aug 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council.
Aug 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Aug 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Aug 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange specialized rehabilitation services — such as physical, occupational, or speech therapy — for residents who needed them.
Aug 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's bedrooms did not give residents visual privacy — such as curtains or dividers — when privacy is needed.
Aug 22, 2025B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Jul 24, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council.
Jul 24, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
Jul 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences.
Jul 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jul 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Sep 15, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
Sep 15, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Sep 15, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Sep 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Sep 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Sep 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Sep 15, 2023B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Sep 15, 2023B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 11).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202380E
202450E
2025110F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNorth Carolina avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.634.013.95bottom 47% in North Carolina; bottom 43% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.310.640.69bottom 10% in North Carolina; bottom 11% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.333.563.50top 45% in North Carolina; bottom 49% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.140.410.48bottom 7% in North Carolina; bottom 4% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)65.849.045.8bottom 14% in North Carolina; bottom 9% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)63.645.742.9bottom 23% in North Carolina; bottom 17% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.37, RN 0.29, weekend 3.09. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Liberty Healthcare Group LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest05/01/2011
McNeill, JohnIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest05/01/2011
McNeill, RonaldIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest05/03/2011
Calcutt, JosephIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2011
Keener, GarrettIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE06/23/2023
McNeill, JohnIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2011
McNeill, RonaldIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE05/03/2011
Miller, RobertIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2024
Purifoy, PennyIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2011
Wilson, JeffreyIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2011
Wilson, JeffreyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2011

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Silas Creek Rehabilitation Center0.3 miWinston Salem, NC★★★★☆4/5
Homestead Hills1.5 miWinston-Salem, NC★★★★☆4/5
Willow Valley Center for Nursing and Rehabilitatio1.7 miWinston-Salem, NC★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Arbor Acres United Methodist Retirement Community2.2 miWinston Salem, NC★★★★☆4/5
Brookridge Retirement Community4.6 miWinston-Salem, NC★★★★★4/5
Salemtowne5.2 miWinston-Salem, NC★★★★☆4/5
Trinity Glen5.4 miWinston-Salem, NC★★★★☆4/5
Mill Creek Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation5.7 miWinston-Salem, NC★★☆☆☆2/5
Cedar Hills Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation6.8 miClemmons, NC★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Trinity Elms7.3 miClemmons, NC★★☆☆☆3/5
Oak Forest Health and Rehabilitation8.3 miWinston Salem, NC★☆☆☆☆2/5
Bermuda Village Retirement Center9.5 miBermuda Run, NC★★★★☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Winston-Salem →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 345284.