Lake Park Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Name: Lake Park Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Address: 3315 Faith Church Road, Indian Trail, NC, 28079, US
Telephone: 7048823420

3315 Faith Church Road, Indian Trail, NC 28079 · Union County · 120 certified beds · avg 104 residents/day · certified since Jun 7, 2000

Part of chain: PRINCIPLE LONG TERM CARE (40 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)

3/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

$34,624

Fines, last 3 years

4.66

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 24, 2025 · F-0686 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 16, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Nov 3, 2023 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Nov 27, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 5, 2023 · F-0697

The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.

Why it matters: Untreated pain causes needless suffering and can lead to depression, poor sleep, and declining health.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jun 2, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 5, 2023 · F-0725

The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.

Why it matters: Understaffing means longer waits for help, missed care, and higher risk of falls and other harm.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jun 2, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (22)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Jan 22, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jan 22, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jan 22, 2026	B · Minimal risk, repeated	The facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council.
Apr 24, 2025	▲ G · Actual harm, one-off	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Oct 24, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Oct 24, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Oct 24, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide proper foot care for residents. Foot care includes routine care like nail trimming and attention to foot problems, which matter greatly for older adults.
Oct 24, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint
Oct 24, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Oct 24, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Oct 24, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · from a complaint
Oct 24, 2024	C · Minimal risk, facility-wide	The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Oct 24, 2024	B · Minimal risk, repeated	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Oct 24, 2024	B · Minimal risk, repeated	The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Nov 3, 2023	▲ G · Actual harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
May 5, 2023	▲ G · Actual harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
May 5, 2023	▲ G · Actual harm, one-off	The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
May 5, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 5, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
May 5, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
May 5, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
May 5, 2023	B · Minimal risk, repeated	The facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (10 → 3).

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2023	8	3	G ▲
2024	10	0	E
2025	1	1	G ▲
2026	3	0	D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $34,624.

Date	Type	Amount / length
Apr 24, 2025	Fine	$25,879
Nov 3, 2023	Fine	$8,745

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	North Carolina avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	4.66	4.01	3.95	top 16% in North Carolina; top 19% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	1.02	0.64	0.69	top 11% in North Carolina; top 15% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	4.25	3.56	3.50	top 14% in North Carolina; top 16% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.59	0.41	0.48	top 16% in North Carolina; top 24% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	34.5	49.0	45.8	top 17% in North Carolina; top 23% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	33.3	45.7	42.9	top 28% in North Carolina; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.02, RN 0.88, weekend 3.66. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Barnabei, Robert	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2022
Boice, Gale	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	03/05/2018
Boice, Gale	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/05/2018
Hill, Raymond	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2011
Hill, Robert	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2011
Hill, Stephen	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2011
Jackson, Rafael	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	06/24/2024
Jackson, Rafael	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	07/03/2025
Johnson, Dianne	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2011
Principle Long Term Care, INC.	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2011

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"How do you assess and manage residents' pain, especially for those who have trouble communicating?"
"What is your nurse and aide staffing ratio on each shift, including nights and weekends?"
"How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
"How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
"Does your facility have an active resident council, and how does management respond to its concerns?"
"How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Royal Park Rehabilitation & Health Center	4.2 mi	Matthews, NC	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Willowbrooke Court SC Ctr at Matthews Glen	4.2 mi	Matthews, NC	★★★★★	4/5
Matthews Health & Rehab Center	6.0 mi	Matthews, NC	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Pruitthealth-Union Pointe	6.1 mi	Monroe, NC	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Brookdale Carriage Club Providence	9.3 mi	Charlotte, NC	★★★★★	5/5
Jesse Helms Nursing Center	9.3 mi	Monroe, NC	★★★★★	5/5
Clear Creek Nursing & Rehabilitation Center	9.5 mi	Mint Hill, NC	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Monroe Rehabilitation Center	9.5 mi	Monroe, NC	★★☆☆☆	2/5	abuse
Sardis Oaks	10.4 mi	Charlotte, NC	★★★☆☆	3/5
Stratford Manor Health & Rehab	10.6 mi	Monroe, NC	★★★☆☆	4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Indian Trail →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 345502.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Lake Park Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

3315 Faith Church Road, Indian Trail, NC 28079 · 7048823420

Health inspection rating 3/5 · CMS overall 4/5· Fines (3y): $34,624

Most serious findings on record:

▲ Apr 24, 2025 (F-0686, Actual harm, one-off): The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
▲ Nov 3, 2023 (F-0689, Actual harm, one-off): The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
▲ May 5, 2023 (F-0697, Actual harm, one-off): The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
☐ "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
☐ "How do you assess and manage residents' pain, especially for those who have trouble communicating?"
☐ "What is your nurse and aide staffing ratio on each shift, including nights and weekends?"
☐ "How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
☐ "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
☐ "Does your facility have an active resident council, and how does management respond to its concerns?"
☐ "How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 345502 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)