North CarolinaMatthews

Royal Park Rehabilitation & Health Center

2700 Roal Commons Lane, Matthews, NC 28105 · Mecklenburg County · 169 certified beds · avg 143 residents/day · certified since Jan 4, 1967

Part of chain: LIBERTY SENIOR LIVING (37 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
4
Serious findings on record
$39,811
Fines, last 3 years
3.42
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Mar 25, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Feb 17, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Dec 5, 2025 · F-0690 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.

Why it matters: Poor continence and catheter care leads to infections, skin breakdown, and loss of dignity.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Dec 16, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, repeated · Mar 25, 2024 · F-0679 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.

Why it matters: Without engaging activities, residents can become bored, isolated, and depressed, and decline faster.

Severity (H): Multiple residents were actually harmed by the same failure — a pattern of real harm, not an isolated incident.

Corrected: Apr 11, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 25, 2024 · F-0687 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide proper foot care for residents. Foot care includes routine care like nail trimming and attention to foot problems, which matter greatly for older adults.

Why it matters: Neglected feet can develop painful sores and infections, especially dangerous for residents with diabetes.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Apr 11, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (25)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 5, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Dec 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2025B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Aug 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Aug 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Mar 25, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Mar 25, 2024▲ H · Actual harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · from a complaint
Mar 25, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper foot care for residents. Foot care includes routine care like nail trimming and attention to foot problems, which matter greatly for older adults. · from a complaint
Mar 25, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint
Mar 25, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · from a complaint
Mar 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Mar 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide special eating equipment and utensils — like adaptive cups or easy-grip silverware — for residents who need them, along with appropriate help at meals. · from a complaint
Oct 4, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Oct 4, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Mar 10, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Mar 10, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 10, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Mar 10, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Mar 10, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 8).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202370E
2024103J ▲
202581G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $39,811.

DateTypeAmount / length
Dec 5, 2025Fine$23,010
Mar 25, 2024Fine$16,801

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNorth Carolina avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.424.013.95bottom 30% in North Carolina; bottom 32% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.360.640.69bottom 18% in North Carolina; bottom 16% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.053.563.50bottom 33% in North Carolina; bottom 34% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.220.410.48bottom 23% in North Carolina; bottom 15% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)46.249.045.8top 44% in North Carolina; bottom 47% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)30.845.742.9top 25% in North Carolina; top 30% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.47, RN 0.37, weekend 3.10. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
John a McNeill Jr 2012 Irrv TrOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Liberty Healthcare Group LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Liberty Real Properties, LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Long Term Care Management Services LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%03/10/2011
Ronald B. and Cynthia J. McNeill 2013 Irrevocable TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Calcutt, JosephIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Calcutt, JosephIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Clements, ThadIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Clements, ThadIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/05/2025
James, NicolaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
James, NicolaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/04/2025
John a McNeill Jr 2012 Irrv TrOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Liberty Healthcare Group LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/29/2025
Liberty Real Properties, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
McNeill, JohnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/23/2006
McNeill, JohnIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/10/2011
McNeill, RobertIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
McNeill, RonaldIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/23/2006
McNeill, RonaldIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/10/2011
Miller, RobertIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Willowbrooke Court SC Ctr at Matthews Glen0.0 miMatthews, NC★★★★★4/5
Matthews Health & Rehab Center2.1 miMatthews, NC★★☆☆☆2/5
Lake Park Nursing and Rehabilitation Center4.2 miIndian Trail, NC★★★★☆3/5
Brookdale Carriage Club Providence5.3 miCharlotte, NC★★★★★5/5
Sardis Oaks6.3 miCharlotte, NC★★★☆☆3/5
Redwood Health & Rehab6.8 miCharlotte, NC★★★☆☆3/5
White Oak Manor - Charlotte7.1 miCharlotte, NC★☆☆☆☆1/5
Pelican Health Randolph LLC7.1 miCharlotte, NC★☆☆☆☆2/5
Wilora Lake Healthcare7.3 miCharlotte, NC★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Clear Creek Nursing & Rehabilitation Center7.5 miMint Hill, NC★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Matthews →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 345026.