How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Roselawn Manor
420 East Fourth Street, Spencerville, OH 45887 (opens Google Maps) · Allen County · (419) 647-4115· 49 certified beds · avg 45 residents/day · certified since Aug 15, 1989 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: HCF MANAGEMENT (22 facilities, chain avg rating 3.1★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jul 27, 2023
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.38
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 12 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. F-0686
The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. F-0693
View all 12 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jul 27, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Jul 27, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Jul 27, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Jul 27, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760 |
| Feb 21, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · F-0600 |
| Feb 21, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · F-0607 |
| Feb 21, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Feb 21, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610 |
| Feb 21, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625 |
| Feb 21, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Feb 21, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Inspection trend by year
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2019
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 7 | 0 | D |
| 2023 | 5 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityOhio averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.38
Ohio average: 3.45
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.57
Ohio average: 0.60
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.94
Ohio average: 3.07
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Ohio avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.38 | 3.45 | 3.95 | top 45% in Ohio; bottom 30% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.69 | top 43% in Ohio; bottom 48% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.94 | 3.07 | 3.50 | top 50% in Ohio; bottom 28% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.29 | 0.42 | 0.48 | bottom 26% in Ohio; bottom 30% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 44.7 | 48.7 | 45.8 | top 40% in Ohio; top 49% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 44.4 | 43.9 | 42.9 | bottom 49% in Ohio; bottom 45% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.48, RN 0.59, weekend 3.03.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.48 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Roselawn Manor. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joann C. Unverferth 11-29-04 Revocable Trust Fbo Kendra M. Unverferth | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 7% | 05/01/2025 |
| Joann C. Unverferth 11-29-04 Revocable Trust Fbo Kevan R. Unverferth | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 7% | 05/01/2025 |
| Joann C. Unverferth 12-29-04 Revocable Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 7% | 05/01/2025 |
| Joann C. Unverferth 12-31-12 Irrevocable Grantor Trust Fbo Kendra M. U | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 9% | 05/01/2025 |
| Joann C. Unverferth 12-31-12 Irrevocable Grantor Trust Fbo Kerri A. Ro | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 9% | 05/01/2025 |
| Joann C. Unverferth 12-31-12 Irrevocable Grantor Trust Fbo Kevan R. Un | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 9% | 05/01/2025 |
| Joann C. Unverferth 12-31-12 Irrevocable Grantor Trust Fbo Kristen S. | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 9% | 05/01/2025 |
| Joann C. Unverferth 12-31-12 Irrevocable Grantor Trust Fbo Kyle J. Unv | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 9% | 05/01/2025 |
| Kerri A. Romes 11-28-18 Business Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 6% | 05/01/2025 |
| Kristen S. Stechschulte 02-21-20 Business Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 6% | 05/01/2025 |
| Kyle J. Unverferth 02-21-20 Business Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 6% | 05/01/2025 |
| HCF Management, INC. | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/18/2002 |
| HCF Management, INC. | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/14/2026 |
| Kimmel, Lacy | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/31/2025 |
| Kimmel, Lacy | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/31/2025 |
| Langhals, Luke | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/31/2025 |
| Langhals, Luke | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/31/2025 |
| Langhals, Luke | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/31/2025 |
| Langhals, Luke | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/31/2025 |
| Ringwald, Ronald | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2016 |
Showing 20 of 31 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 11 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain HCF Management — 22 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Shawnee Manor — Lima, OH · overall 4/5
- St Catherine's C C of Fostoria — Fostoria, OH · overall 3/5
- St Catherines Manor of Washington Court House — Washington Court Hou, OH · overall 4/5
- The Manor at Greendale — Findlay, OH · overall 5/5
- Van Wert Manor — Van Wert, OH · overall 5/5
- Village at the Greene — Dayton, OH · overall 1/5
- Wapakoneta Manor — Wapakoneta, OH · overall 4/5
- Bradford Manor Nursing and Rehab — Bradford, PA · overall 3/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 21 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
- "How do you decide when a feeding tube is truly needed, and how do staff care for residents who have one?"
- "What is your approach to psychiatric medications — how do you try non-drug options first and work to reduce doses over time?"
- "What systems do you use to prevent medication errors, and what happens when one occurs?"
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "What specific steps do you take to prevent abuse and neglect, and how are staff trained on them?"
- "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 45% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 31 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 22 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meadows of Delphos the | 8.2 mi | Delphos, OH | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Vancrest of Delphos | 9.7 mi | Delphos, OH | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Springs of Lima the | 9.9 mi | Lima, OH | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Shawnee Manor | 10.6 mi | Lima, OH | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Otterbein-Cridersville | 11.1 mi | Cridersville, OH | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Grande Lake Healthcare Center | 11.3 mi | St Marys, OH | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Vancrest of St Mary's | 11.3 mi | St Marys, OH | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Lima Convalescent Home | 11.4 mi | Lima, OH | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Transitional Care Unit | 11.4 mi | Saint Marys, OH | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Liberty Retirement Community of Lima INC | 11.6 mi | Lima, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Wapakoneta Manor | 11.7 mi | Wapakoneta, OH | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Cridersville Nursing and Rehab | 11.7 mi | Cridersville, OH | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Allen, OH — 11 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Springview Manor — Lima, OH · overall 4/5
- Willow Ridge of Mennonite Home Communities of Ohio — Bluffton, OH · overall 5/5
- Carecore at Lima — Lima, OH · overall 3/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 365744.