OhioSt Marys

Grande Lake Healthcare Center

1209 Indiana Avenue, St Marys, OH 45885 · Auglaize County · 45 certified beds · avg 43 residents/day · certified since Oct 5, 1990

Part of chain: COMMUNICARE HEALTH (110 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.47
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 27, 2025 · F-0760 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.

Why it matters: A serious medication error can cause real harm, hospitalization, or worse.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 21, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (33)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 27, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Feb 27, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Feb 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Feb 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Feb 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide special eating equipment and utensils — like adaptive cups or easy-grip silverware — for residents who need them, along with appropriate help at meals.
Feb 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly inform residents or their representatives about arbitration agreements — contracts that give up the right to sue in court — including their right to refuse to sign.
Jun 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Feb 13, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Feb 13, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility's activities program was not run by a qualified professional. The person directing recreation and social activities must have proper training or credentials.
Feb 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Feb 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Feb 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Feb 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Feb 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Feb 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Feb 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Feb 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
Jan 4, 2020F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not serve meals and snacks at times that fit residents' needs, preferences, and requests, or did not offer nourishing alternatives for residents who want to eat outside scheduled meal times.
Jan 4, 2020F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 4, 2020E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from being involuntarily separated — kept apart from other residents, kept out of their own room, or confined to their room. Isolating a resident this way is a form of mistreatment.
Jan 4, 2020E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Jan 4, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Jan 4, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Jan 4, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Jan 4, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Jan 4, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jan 4, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jan 4, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Jan 4, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jan 4, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Jan 4, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or obtain laboratory tests when a doctor ordered them, or did not promptly report the results back to the doctor who ordered them.
Jan 4, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (10 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2020150F
2023100F
202410D
202571G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOhio avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.473.453.95top 39% in Ohio; bottom 35% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.420.600.69bottom 23% in Ohio; bottom 25% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.113.073.50top 37% in Ohio; bottom 37% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.220.420.48bottom 12% in Ohio; bottom 17% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)43.248.745.8top 36% in Ohio; top 45% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)57.143.942.9bottom 28% in Ohio; bottom 26% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.22, RN 0.39, weekend 2.89. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Health Care Lease Facilities, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest03/01/2018
Sxcy Holdings, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest01/01/2022
Sxcy MSTR Lsco, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%01/01/2022
C.R. Stoltz Family Investment Company INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2018
C.R. Stoltz Irrevocable TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2018
Groves, DonnaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/14/2023
Health Care Lease Facilities, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2018
I. Rosedale Irrevocable TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2018
Indiana Mgt Co., LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2018
Indiana Mgt Co., LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/16/2025
Peyton, JosephIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/28/2022
Peyton, JosephIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/15/2025
R.S. Wilheim Irrevocable TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2018
Romeo, DominicIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
Romeo, DominicIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
Ronald S Wilheim 2012 Spousal TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2018
Rosedale Family Investment Company, INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2018
RRW, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2018
S.L. Rosedale Irrevocable TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2018
Skilled HC Holdings, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2018

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Vancrest of St Mary's1.5 miSt Marys, OH★★★★★5/5
Transitional Care Unit1.7 miSaint Marys, OH★★★★☆4/5
Otterbein St Marys Retirement Community2.8 miSt Marys, OH★★★★☆4/5
Gardens at Celina7.9 miCelina, OH★★★★☆4/5
Celina Manor8.2 miCelina, OH★★★★☆4/5
Wapakoneta Manor10.7 miWapakoneta, OH★★★★☆4/5
Carecore at Minster10.8 miMinster, OH★★★☆☆3/5
Roselawn Manor11.3 miSpencerville, OH★★★★★4/5
Briarwood Village14.3 miColdwater, OH★☆☆☆☆1/5
Otterbein-Cridersville14.8 miCridersville, OH★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in St Marys →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 365809.