160 Fox Rd, Van Wert, OH 45891 (opens Google Maps) · Van Wert County · (419) 238-6655· 62 certified beds · avg 53 residents/day · certified since Jun 25, 1970 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: HCF MANAGEMENT (22 facilities, chain avg rating 3.1★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected May 8, 2025
1
Serious findings on record
most recent May 8, 2025
$25,490
Fines, last 3 years
3.89
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: May 28, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 9 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
G · Actual harm, isolated
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. F-0686
F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread
The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. F-0727
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. F-0695
View all 9 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
Date
Severity
What the facility was cited for
May 8, 2025
▲ G · Actual harm, isolated
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686
May 8, 2025
F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread
The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · F-0727
May 8, 2025
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695
Dec 7, 2022
F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Dec 7, 2022
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655
Dec 7, 2022
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Dec 7, 2022
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692
Aug 1, 2019
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582
Aug 1, 2019
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (4 → 3).
Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2019
All citations:
2
Serious citations (G–L):
0
2022
All citations:
4
Serious citations (G–L):
0
2025
All citations:
3
Serious citations (G–L):
1
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
Year
Citations
Serious (G–L)
Worst severity that year
2019
2
0
D
2022
4
0
F
2025
3
1
G ▲
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
Date
Type
Amount / length
May 8, 2025
Fine
$25,490
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityOhio averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility:
3.89
Ohio average:
3.45
U.S. average:
3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility:
0.71
Ohio average:
0.60
U.S. average:
0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility:
3.41
Ohio average:
3.07
U.S. average:
3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
Measure
This facility
Ohio avg
U.S. avg
Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
3.89
3.45
3.95
top 19% in Ohio; top 44% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours
0.71
0.60
0.69
top 24% in Ohio; top 35% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing
3.41
3.07
3.50
top 20% in Ohio; top 47% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)
0.37
0.42
0.48
bottom 46% in Ohio; bottom 47% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)
34.5
48.7
45.8
top 15% in Ohio; top 23% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)
44.4
43.9
42.9
bottom 49% in Ohio; bottom 45% in the U.S.
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.77, RN 0.69, weekend 3.31.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.77 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Van Wert Manor. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Joann C. Unverferth 12-31-12 Irrevocable Grantor Trust Fbo Kendra M. U
Organization
5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
7%
12/13/2021
Joann C. Unverferth 12-31-12 Irrevocable Grantor Trust Fbo Kerri A. Ro
Organization
5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
7%
12/13/2021
Joann C. Unverferth 12-31-12 Irrevocable Grantor Trust Fbo Kevan R. Un
Organization
5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
7%
12/13/2021
Joann C. Unverferth 12-31-12 Irrevocable Grantor Trust Fbo Kristen S.
Organization
5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
7%
12/13/2021
Joann C. Unverferth 12-31-12 Irrevocable Grantor Trust Fbo Kyle J. Unv
Organization
5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
7%
12/13/2021
Joseph L. Unverferth 12-15-11 Irrv Grantor Tr
Organization
5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
6%
12/13/2021
Lawrence G. Unverferth 12-13-11 Irrv Grantor Tr
Organization
5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
6%
12/13/2021
R. Steven Unverferth 12-14-11 Irrv Grantor Tr
Organization
5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
6%
12/13/2021
HCF Management, INC.
Organization
Operational/Managerial Control
NOT APPLICABLE
01/01/2004
Klay, Celeste
Individual
W-2 Managing Employee
NOT APPLICABLE
08/01/2011
Klay, Celeste
Individual
Corporate Director
NOT APPLICABLE
01/01/2016
Klay, Celeste
Individual
Corporate Officer
NOT APPLICABLE
01/01/2016
Romes, Kerri
Individual
W-2 Managing Employee
NOT APPLICABLE
04/01/2013
Romes, Kerri
Individual
Corporate Director
NOT APPLICABLE
03/29/2019
Romes, Kerri
Individual
Corporate Officer
NOT APPLICABLE
11/01/2019
Shaw, Anthony
Individual
W-2 Managing Employee
NOT APPLICABLE
08/29/1994
Showing 20 of 25 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 5 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain HCF Management — 22 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.