Ohio ›Wapakoneta

Wapakoneta Manor

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

1010 Lincoln Ave, Wapakoneta, OH 45895 (opens Google Maps) · Auglaize County · (419) 738-3711· 73 certified beds · avg 66 residents/day · certified since Feb 18, 1970 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: HCF MANAGEMENT (22 facilities, chain avg rating 3.1★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected May 16, 2024
1
Serious findings on record
most recent May 16, 2024
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.39
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →

⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, isolated · May 16, 2024 · F-0686 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Jul 5, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 14 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint F-0686

  2. G · Actual harm, isolated

    The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint F-0686

  3. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. F-0550

View all 14 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 11, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686
May 16, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686
May 16, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550
May 16, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
May 16, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657
May 16, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Sep 1, 2022E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641
Sep 1, 2022E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Sep 1, 2022D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561
Sep 1, 2022D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686
Sep 1, 2022C · Potential for minimal harm, widespreadThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732
Sep 12, 2019F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespreadThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Sep 12, 2019E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Sep 12, 2019D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 5).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2019
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2022
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 1

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201930F
202250E
202461G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

0 fines totaling $0, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.

DateTypeAmount / length
May 16, 2024Payment Denial20 days from Jun 15, 2024

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityOhio averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.39
Ohio average: 3.45
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.59
Ohio average: 0.60
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.18
Ohio average: 3.07
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityOhio avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.393.453.95top 44% in Ohio; bottom 31% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.590.600.69top 41% in Ohio; top 49% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.183.073.50top 32% in Ohio; bottom 41% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.450.420.48top 34% in Ohio; top 40% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)36.548.745.8top 19% in Ohio; top 28% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)30.843.942.9top 29% in Ohio; top 30% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.57, RN 0.62, weekend 3.35.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.57 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Wapakoneta Manor. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Chad M. Unverferth 12-14-11 Irrv Grantor TrOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest6%12/13/2021
David V. Unverferth 12-14-11 Irrv Grantor TrOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest6%12/13/2021
Jeffrey L. Unverferth 12-14-11 Irrv Grantor TrOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest6%12/13/2021
Joann C. Unverferth 12-29-04 Revocable TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest5%12/13/2021
Joann C. Unverferth 12-31-12 Irrevocable Grantor Trust Fbo Kendra M. UOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest7%12/13/2021
Joann C. Unverferth 12-31-12 Irrevocable Grantor Trust Fbo Kerri A. RoOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest7%12/13/2021
Joann C. Unverferth 12-31-12 Irrevocable Grantor Trust Fbo Kevan R. UnOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest7%12/13/2021
Joann C. Unverferth 12-31-12 Irrevocable Grantor Trust Fbo Kristen S.Organization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest7%12/13/2021
Joann C. Unverferth 12-31-12 Irrevocable Grantor Trust Fbo Kyle J. UnvOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest7%12/13/2021
Joseph L. Unverferth 12-15-11 Irrv Grantor TrOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest6%12/13/2021
Lawrence G. Unverferth 12-13-11 Irrv Grantor TrOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest6%12/13/2021
R. Steven Unverferth 12-14-11 Irrv Grantor TrOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest6%12/13/2021
HCF Management, INC.OrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2004
HCF Management, INC.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/03/2024
Klay, CelesteIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2016
Klay, CelesteIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2016
Klay, CelesteIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2016
Klay, CelesteIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2016
Romes, KerriIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/29/2019
Romes, KerriIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2019

Showing 20 of 30 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 10 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain HCF Management — 22 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 21 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
  • "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
  • "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
  • "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
  • "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
  • "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
  • "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
  • "What choices do residents have over their daily schedule, like meal times, bathing, and activities?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 37% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 30 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 21 within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Otterbein-Cridersville5.4 miCridersville, OH★★★☆☆3/5
Cridersville Nursing and Rehab6.2 miCridersville, OH★☆☆☆☆1/5
Transitional Care Unit9.1 miSaint Marys, OH★★★★☆4/5
Shawnee Manor9.2 miLima, OH★★★★☆4/5
Vancrest of St Mary's9.3 miSt Marys, OH★★★★★5/5
Grande Lake Healthcare Center10.7 miSt Marys, OH★★★☆☆3/5
Springs of Lima the11.4 miLima, OH★★★★★5/5
Roselawn Manor11.7 miSpencerville, OH★★★★★4/5
Springview Manor11.8 miLima, OH★★★★☆3/5
Lima Convalescent Home12.0 miLima, OH★★★★☆3/5
Carecore at Lima12.2 miLima, OH★★★☆☆2/5
Otterbein St Marys Retirement Community12.5 miSt Marys, OH★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Auglaize, OH — 8 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Wapakoneta →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 365238.

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details