Florida ›Clearwater

Regency Oaks Health Center

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

2770 Regency Oaks Blvd, Clearwater, FL 33759 (opens Google Maps) · Pinellas County · (727) 791-1500· 60 certified beds · avg 55 residents/day · certified since Oct 7, 1991 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: HEALTHPEAK PROPERTIES, INC. (15 facilities, chain avg rating 3.5★)

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Dec 11, 2024
5
Serious findings on record
most recent Dec 2, 2022
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.41
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Dec 2, 2022 · F-0600

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Jan 1, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Dec 2, 2022 · F-0609

The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.

Why it matters: When incidents aren't reported promptly, abusers may continue harming residents and outside authorities can't step in.

Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Jan 1, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Dec 2, 2022 · F-0610

The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.

Why it matters: When allegations aren't investigated, harm to residents can continue unchecked.

Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Jan 1, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Dec 2, 2022 · F-0699

The facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from.

Why it matters: Care that ignores a resident's trauma or culture can cause distress and damage their trust in caregivers.

Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Jan 1, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Dec 2, 2022 · F-0835

The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.

Why it matters: Poor administration often shows up as understaffing, supply shortages, and care problems across the whole facility.

Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Jan 1, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 16 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern

    The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. F-0645

  2. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. F-0676

  3. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. F-0679

View all 16 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 11, 2024E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645
Dec 11, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · F-0676
Dec 11, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679
Dec 2, 2022▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · F-0600
Dec 2, 2022▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609
Dec 2, 2022▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolatedThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610
Dec 2, 2022▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolatedThe facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from. · F-0699
Dec 2, 2022▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolatedThe facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · F-0835
Dec 2, 2022D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561
Dec 2, 2022D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686
Dec 2, 2022D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759
Dec 2, 2022D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Jun 4, 2021E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Jun 4, 2021D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
Jun 4, 2021D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686
Jun 4, 2021D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · F-0908

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (9 → 3).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2021
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2022
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 5
2024
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202140E
202295J ▲
202430E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityFlorida averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 4.41
Florida average: 4.03
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 1.00
Florida average: 0.76
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 4.09
Florida average: 3.68
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityFlorida avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.414.033.95top 18% in Florida; top 26% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.000.760.69top 19% in Florida; top 16% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.093.683.50top 15% in Florida; top 20% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.890.530.48top 12% in Florida; top 8% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)39.741.445.8top 44% in Florida; top 35% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)47.446.042.9bottom 47% in Florida; bottom 40% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.28, RN 0.97, weekend 3.97.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.28 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Regency Oaks Health Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
HCP Ma3 GP Holding, LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/19/2026
HCP Ventures II TRS LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/19/2026
Blackrock INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/19/2026
Bolden, KyleIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/04/2021
Bolden, KyleIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/28/2025
CCRC Propco Ventures, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/19/2026
Cheng, PatrickIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/31/2022
HCP Ma3, LPOrganizationLimited Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/19/2026
HCP Ma3, LPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/19/2026
HCP Partners LPOrganizationLimited Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/19/2026
HCP Partners LPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/19/2026
HCP S-H 2014 Member LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/19/2026
HCP Ventures II Partner LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/19/2026
HCP/LS 2011 Reit, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/19/2026
Healthpeak Op LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/19/2026
Healthpeak Properties INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/19/2026
Janus Living Op LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/19/2026
Janus Living, INC.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/19/2026
Janus Member, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/19/2026
Life Care Services LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2020

Showing 20 of 28 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 8 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Healthpeak Properties, INC. — 15 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 14 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
  • "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
  • "If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
  • "How do you learn about each resident's background and history, and how does that shape their care?"
  • "What were the findings behind this administration citation, and what has leadership changed since?"
  • "How do you screen new residents for mental health and disability-related needs, and how do you provide the specialized services they require?"
  • "How do you help residents maintain their daily living skills, and how do you measure whether it's working?"
  • "Can I see this month's activities calendar, and what do you offer residents who can't leave their rooms?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 40% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 28 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 91 within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Advanced Care Center1.8 miClearwater, FL★★★★☆3/5
Aviata at Sand Key1.9 miClearwater, FL★★☆☆☆1/5
Aviata at the Harbor1.9 miSafety Harbor, FL★★☆☆☆2/5
Kensington Gardens Rehab and Nursing Center2.2 miClearwater, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5
Harbourwood Post-Acute and Rehabilitation Center2.6 miClearwater, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Aviata at Lakeside Oaks3.0 miDunedin, FL★★☆☆☆2/5
Westchester Gardens Health & Rehabilitation3.3 miClearwater, FL★★★★☆3/5
Lake Haven Nursing and Rehab Center3.3 miDunedin, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5
Meadowpark Health and Rehabilitation Center3.4 miDunedin, FL★★★★☆3/5
Willowbrooke Court Skilled Care Center at Mease Li3.6 miDunedin, FL★★★★★5/5
Palm Garden of Clearwater3.7 miClearwater, FL★★☆☆☆1/5
Highland Pines Rehabilitation Center4.2 miClearwater, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Pinellas, FL — 65 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Clearwater →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105744.

This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details