FloridaClearwater

Highland Pines Rehabilitation Center

1111 S Highland Ave, Clearwater, FL 33756 · Pinellas County · 115 certified beds · avg 107 residents/day · certified since Feb 1, 1990

Part of chain: FLORIDA INSTITUTE FOR LONG-TERM CARE (17 facilities, chain avg rating 2.2★)

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
7
Serious findings on record
$196,670
Fines, last 3 years
3.57
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Apr 17, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: May 17, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Apr 17, 2025 · F-0710 · triggered by a complaint

The facility admitted a resident without a doctor's order, or did not make sure each resident stayed under a doctor's ongoing care.

Why it matters: A resident without proper physician oversight may go without medical direction for their treatment and medications.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: May 17, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Apr 17, 2025 · F-0726 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.

Why it matters: Undertrained caregivers are more likely to miss warning signs and make care mistakes.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: May 17, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Apr 17, 2025 · F-0773 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide or obtain laboratory tests when a doctor ordered them, or did not promptly report the results back to the doctor who ordered them.

Why it matters: Delayed labs or unreported results can hold up a diagnosis and delay urgent treatment.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: May 17, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Apr 17, 2025 · F-0867 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.

Why it matters: Without a working quality program, the same care problems tend to repeat instead of getting fixed.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: May 17, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 4, 2026 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 1, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 18, 2021 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Apr 18, 2021 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (37)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 4, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Mar 4, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
Mar 4, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint
Apr 17, 2025▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Apr 17, 2025▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility admitted a resident without a doctor's order, or did not make sure each resident stayed under a doctor's ongoing care. · from a complaint
Apr 17, 2025▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint
Apr 17, 2025▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not provide or obtain laboratory tests when a doctor ordered them, or did not promptly report the results back to the doctor who ordered them. · from a complaint
Apr 17, 2025▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · from a complaint
Aug 29, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Aug 29, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Aug 29, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Aug 29, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 29, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Aug 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Aug 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Aug 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Aug 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
Aug 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Aug 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids.
Aug 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Aug 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Aug 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
Aug 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life.
Apr 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint
Dec 27, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Nov 8, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Nov 8, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · from a complaint
Jul 21, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 21, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Mar 18, 2021▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Mar 18, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Mar 18, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Mar 18, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Mar 18, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Mar 18, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Mar 18, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Mar 18, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 15).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202181G ▲
202220F
202330E
2024160F
202555K ▲
202631G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $196,670.

DateTypeAmount / length
Apr 17, 2025Fine$182,782
Nov 8, 2023Fine$13,888

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityFlorida avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.574.033.95bottom 21% in Florida; bottom 40% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.340.760.69bottom 3% in Florida; bottom 13% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.473.683.50bottom 43% in Florida; top 44% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.230.530.48bottom 8% in Florida; bottom 17% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)48.541.445.8bottom 31% in Florida; bottom 41% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)80.046.042.9bottom 4% in Florida; bottom 6% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.13, RN 0.29, weekend 3.04. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Fi-Highland Pines, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%10/01/2003
Florida Institute for Long Term Care LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest12/23/2002
Consulting Support Services, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/28/2011
Consulting Support Services, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/07/2025
Facility Support Company, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/13/2010
Facility Support Company, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/20/2025
Florida Institute for Long Term Care LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/07/2025
Gentile, GinaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/09/2018
Gentile, GinaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/09/2018
Jaffe, HowardIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2012
Kane Financial Services, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/06/2012
Kane Financial Services, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/20/2025
Katz-Hall, KathyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2012
Mullarkey, JamesIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2012
Omega Health Investors, INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2003
Richmond, PennyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2012
Select Rehabilitation, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/19/2016
Themis Health Management, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2009
Themis Health Management, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/07/2025
Wilson, MelanieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/12/2018

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Clearwater Center0.7 miClearwater, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Gulfside Health and Rehabilitation Center1.0 miClearwater, FL★★★☆☆2/5
Morton Plant Rehabilitation Center1.6 miBelleair, FL★★★★★3/5
Oaks of Clearwater, the1.8 miClearwater, FL★★☆☆☆2/5
Belleair Health Care Center1.9 miClearwater, FL★★★★☆4/5
Kensington Gardens Rehab and Nursing Center2.0 miClearwater, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5
Aviata at Sand Key2.8 miClearwater, FL★★☆☆☆1/5
Harbourwood Post-Acute and Rehabilitation Center3.2 miClearwater, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Advanced Care Center3.3 miClearwater, FL★★★★☆3/5
East Bay Rehabilitation Center3.4 miClearwater, FL★★★★☆3/5
Palm Garden of Pinellas3.7 miLargo, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5
Sabal Palms Health & Rehabilitation3.8 miLargo, FL★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Clearwater →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105690.