How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
8 Peabody Road, Derry, NH 03038 (opens Google Maps) · Rockingham County · (603) 434-1566· 112 certified beds · avg 92 residents/day · certified since Feb 13, 1990 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 16 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656
The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. F-0658
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jan 14, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Jan 14, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Dec 1, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · F-0726 |
| Dec 1, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · F-0730 |
| Dec 1, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them. · F-0865 |
| Dec 1, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| Dec 1, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · F-0552 |
| Dec 1, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Dec 1, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Dec 1, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Dec 1, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Dec 1, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Dec 1, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Dec 1, 2023 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 3).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 12 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 3 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New Hampshire avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.77 | 4.11 | 3.95 | top 50% in New Hampshire; top 50% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.20 | 0.82 | 0.69 | top 10% in New Hampshire; top 9% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.22 | 3.67 | 3.50 | bottom 46% in New Hampshire; bottom 43% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.90 | 0.55 | 0.48 | top 6% in New Hampshire; top 8% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 43.2 | 44.1 | 45.8 | top 46% in New Hampshire; top 45% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 33.3 | 40.9 | 42.9 | top 28% in New Hampshire; top 33% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.47, RN 1.11, weekend 2.96.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.47 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Pleasant Valley Nursing and Rehab Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ac Healthcare LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| DC Healthcare LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| DC II Irrevocable Trust | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Jacobs, Sholom | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Mad Family Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Mec Healthcare Irrevocable Trust | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Mec Healthcare LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Nat Pleasant Valley LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Parcon Pleasant Valley LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Pleasant Valley JV Holdco LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 11/01/2024 |
| SJ Healthcare LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| SK Healthcare LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Stevenson, Sean | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Linehan, Meghan | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Linehan, Meghan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Mad Family Holdings LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Mad Family Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/08/2025 |
| Nat Pleasant Valley LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Nat Pleasant Valley LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/08/2025 |
| Pleasant Valley JV Holdco LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
Showing 20 of 25 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 5 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Derry Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare | 0.7 mi | Derry, NH | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Warde Health Center | 6.2 mi | Windham, NH | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Holy Cross Health Center | 7.4 mi | Manchester, NH | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Villa Crest Nursing and Retirement Center | 8.1 mi | Manchester, NH | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Hanover Hill Health Care Center | 8.9 mi | Manchester, NH | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| St Joseph Residence | 8.9 mi | Manchester, NH | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Salemhaven | 9.3 mi | Salem, NH | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Saint Teresa Rehabilitation & Nursing Center | 9.4 mi | Manchester, NH | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Ridgewood Center, Genesis Healthcare | 9.4 mi | Bedford, NH | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Bedford Hills Center | 9.7 mi | Bedford, NH | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Maple Leaf Health Care Center | 10.0 mi | Manchester, NH | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Mount Carmel Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 10.0 mi | Manchester, NH | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Rockingham, NH — 12 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 305039.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details