Park Place Nursing Facility

Name: Park Place Nursing Facility
Address: 1865 Bold Springs Road, Monroe, GA, 30655, US
Telephone: 7702678677

1865 Bold Springs Road, Monroe, GA 30655 · Walton County · 175 certified beds · avg 169 residents/day · certified since Nov 11, 1993

Part of chain: MICHAEL FEIST (7 facilities, chain avg rating 3.6★)

2/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

3.90

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jun 11, 2026 · F-0656 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.

Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jul 7, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jun 11, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jul 7, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (13)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Jun 11, 2026	▲ G · Actual harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Jun 11, 2026	▲ G · Actual harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jun 11, 2026	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Jun 11, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Apr 10, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 10, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Apr 10, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Apr 10, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 28, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Feb 28, 2024	C · Minimal risk, facility-wide	The facility hired someone with an official finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft against them. Facilities are not allowed to employ people with such findings. · from a complaint
Jan 20, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Jan 20, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jan 20, 2023	B · Minimal risk, repeated	The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (4 → 4).

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2023	3	0	D
2024	2	0	D
2025	4	0	D
2026	4	2	G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Georgia avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.90	3.54	3.95	top 20% in Georgia; top 44% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.47	0.50	0.69	top 47% in Georgia; bottom 34% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	3.30	3.09	3.50	top 27% in Georgia; bottom 47% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.42	0.35	0.48	top 22% in Georgia; top 44% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	47.8	46.0	45.8	bottom 44% in Georgia; bottom 42% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	73.3	44.5	42.9	bottom 10% in Georgia; bottom 9% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.43, RN 0.54, weekend 3.74. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Feist, Michael	Individual	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	11/01/2021
Murray, Elmer	Individual	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	—	10/02/1992
Park Place Operations Holdings LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	100%	11/01/2021
Park Place Operations Holdings Parent LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	—	11/01/2021
Feist, Michael	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2021
Feist, Michael	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2021
Murray, Elmer	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	07/21/2003
Murray, Elmer	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/1979

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
"Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
"Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
"How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
"Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
"When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection
Social Circle Nsg & Rehab Ctr	9.4 mi	Social Circle, GA	★★☆☆☆	3/5
Winder Center for Nursing and Healing	12.5 mi	Winder, GA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
High Shoals Health and Rehabilitation	13.8 mi	Bishop, GA	★★★★☆	4/5
Riverside Health Care Center	16.2 mi	Covington, GA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Pruitthealth - Covington	16.9 mi	Covington, GA	★★★☆☆	4/5
Parkside Post Acute and Rehabilitation	17.4 mi	Snellville, GA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Mesun Health and Rehabilitation Center	17.4 mi	Lawrenceville, GA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Rockdale Healthcare Center	18.2 mi	Conyers, GA	★★☆☆☆	3/5
Westbury Center of Conyers for Nursing and Healing	18.6 mi	Conyers, GA	★★★☆☆	4/5
University Nursing & Rehab Center	18.8 mi	Athens, GA	★☆☆☆☆	2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Monroe →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 115005.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Park Place Nursing Facility

1865 Bold Springs Road, Monroe, GA 30655 · 7702678677

Health inspection rating 2/5 · CMS overall 2/5· Fines (3y): $0

Most serious findings on record:

▲ Jun 11, 2026 (F-0656, Actual harm, one-off): The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
▲ Jun 11, 2026 (F-0689, Actual harm, one-off): The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
☐ "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
☐ "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
☐ "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
☐ "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
☐ "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
☐ "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
☐ "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 115005 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)