Florida ›Orlando

Palm Garden of Orlando

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

654 N Econlockhatchee Trail, Orlando, FL 32825 (opens Google Maps) · Orange County · (407) 273-6158· 132 certified beds · avg 125 residents/day · certified since Sep 21, 1987 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: PALM GARDEN HEALTH AND REHABILITATION (14 facilities, chain avg rating 3.1★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Nov 7, 2024
2
Serious findings on record
most recent Sep 30, 2024
$73,226
Fines, last 3 years
4.19
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Jul 25, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Jul 25, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, isolated · Sep 30, 2024 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Oct 24, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 16 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern

    The facility did not properly inform residents or their representatives about arbitration agreements — contracts that give up the right to sue in court — including their right to refuse to sign. F-0847

  2. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. F-0644

  3. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. F-0867

View all 16 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Nov 7, 2024E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not properly inform residents or their representatives about arbitration agreements — contracts that give up the right to sue in court — including their right to refuse to sign. · F-0847
Nov 7, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644
Nov 7, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · F-0867
Sep 30, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684
Sep 30, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint · F-0725
Sep 30, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. · from a complaint · F-0849
Jul 25, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689
Feb 16, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578
Feb 16, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · F-0604
Feb 16, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644
Feb 16, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645
Mar 25, 2021E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · F-0694
Mar 25, 2021E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Mar 25, 2021D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584
Mar 25, 2021D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677
Mar 25, 2021D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (4 → 3).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2021
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 2

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202150E
202340D
202472J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

2 fines totaling $73,226.

Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.

DateTypeAmount / length
Sep 30, 2024Fine$62,381
Jul 25, 2024Fine$10,845

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityFlorida averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 4.19
Florida average: 4.03
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.76
Florida average: 0.76
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.91
Florida average: 3.68
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityFlorida avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.194.033.95top 27% in Florida; top 32% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.760.760.69top 39% in Florida; top 31% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.913.683.50top 21% in Florida; top 25% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.490.530.48top 44% in Florida; top 34% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)38.141.445.8top 40% in Florida; top 31% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)40.946.042.9top 41% in Florida; top 49% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.81, RN 0.69, weekend 3.56.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.81 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Palm Garden of Orlando. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
James O. McCarver Qtip Business Marital Trust U/A Dated June 22, 2001,Organization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest—12/23/2014
James O. McCarver Residuary Trust Share U/A Dated 06/22/2001Organization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest—12/23/2014
McCarver, PatsyIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest—11/01/2013
Palm Garden Healthcare Holdings, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest50%11/01/2013
Patsy E. McCarver Trust U/A Dated June 22, 2001 as Amended, Patsy EOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest—11/01/2013
Bomberger, JeffreyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2014
Chalmers, JamesIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015
Greene, RobertIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2014
Hovey, GregIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/05/2022
Hovey, GregIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/21/2025
James O. McCarver Qtip Business Marital Trust U/A Dated June 22, 2001,OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2013
Nuriel, GabrielIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2021
Nuriel, GabrielIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/21/2025
Palm Healthcare Management, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/21/2025
Patsy E. McCarver Trust U/A Dated June 22, 2001 as Amended, Patsy EOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2013
Pgorl Re, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/29/2024
Pgorl Re, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/29/2024
Regions BankOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2013
Regions BankOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2013

All 19 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Palm Garden Health and Rehabilitation — 14 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 13 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
  • "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
  • "Is signing an arbitration agreement required for admission, and can we refuse it without affecting my family member's care?"
  • "How do you identify and arrange specialized services for residents with mental health conditions or disabilities?"
  • "How does your quality committee work, and can you give an example of a problem it recently identified and fixed?"
  • "What is your nurse and aide staffing ratio on each shift, including nights and weekends?"
  • "How do you coordinate hospice care, and can residents stay here while receiving it?"
  • "How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 38% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 19 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 47 within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Solaris Healthcare East Orlando1.6 miOrlando, FL★★★★★4/5
Lotus Nursing and Rehabilitation Center1.8 miOrlando, FL★★☆☆☆2/5
Life Care Center of Orlando3.4 miOrlando, FL★★★★★4/5
Avante at Orlando INC3.8 miOrlando, FL★★★☆☆3/5
Winter Park Care and Rehabilitation4.3 miWinter Park, FL★☆☆☆☆2/5
Westminster Baldwin Park4.5 miOrlando, FL★★★★★4/5
Alwyn C Cashe State Veterans Nursing Home4.5 miOrlando, FL★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
Conway Lakes Health & Rehabilitation Center4.6 miOrlando, FL★★☆☆☆2/5
Regents Park of Winter Park4.7 miWinter Park, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5
Westminster Winter Park5.0 miWinter Park, FL★★★★★4/5
Parkview Rehabilitation Center at Winter Park5.3 miWinter Park, FL★★★★★4/5
Mayflower Healthcare Center5.4 miWinter Park, FL★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Orange, FL — 36 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Orlando →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105577.

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details