9 Arbetter Drive, Framingham, MA 01701 (opens Google Maps) · Middlesex County · (508) 877-3300· 123 certified beds · avg 111 residents/day · certified since Nov 20, 1995 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: ATLAS HEALTHCARE (29 facilities, chain avg rating 3.6★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Jun 12, 2025 · F-0656 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 12, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Jun 12, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 12, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 27 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint F-0656
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jun 12, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Jun 12, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Oct 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Oct 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · F-0604 |
| Oct 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| Oct 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Oct 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not notify the appropriate authorities when a resident with a mental disorder or intellectual disability had a significant change in condition. · F-0646 |
| Oct 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Oct 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Oct 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Oct 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Oct 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Aug 28, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Aug 28, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Aug 28, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · F-0552 |
| Aug 28, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| Aug 28, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not notify the appropriate authorities when a resident with a mental disorder or intellectual disability had a significant change in condition. · F-0646 |
| Aug 28, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Aug 28, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Aug 28, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Aug 28, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Aug 28, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Aug 28, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760 |
| Aug 28, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have an agreement with an approved laboratory to provide lab services, even though it doesn't offer lab services on site. · F-0772 |
| Aug 28, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service. · F-0801 |
| Aug 28, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (10 → 1).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 14 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 10 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 2 | 2 | J ▲ |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $211,819.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2025 | Fine | $211,819 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Massachusetts avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.43 | 3.89 | 3.95 | bottom 28% in Massachusetts; bottom 33% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.30 | 0.65 | 0.69 | bottom 5% in Massachusetts; bottom 9% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.01 | 3.51 | 3.50 | bottom 23% in Massachusetts; bottom 32% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.19 | 0.46 | 0.48 | bottom 8% in Massachusetts; bottom 11% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 41.4 | 38.2 | 45.8 | bottom 37% in Massachusetts; top 40% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 52.6 | 42.6 | 42.9 | bottom 29% in Massachusetts; bottom 32% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.79, RN 0.33, weekend 3.33.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.79 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Oak Knoll Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JMH Family LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 02/28/2025 |
| JMH Family Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 02/28/2025 |
| Miller, Nachum | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 02/28/2025 |
| MLS Family LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 02/28/2025 |
| MLS Family Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 02/28/2025 |
| SGS Family LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 02/28/2025 |
| SGS Family Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 02/28/2025 |
| Whittier 6 Operations Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 02/28/2025 |
| Whittier Mop Operations Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 02/28/2025 |
| Bak, Pinchos | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/28/2025 |
| Bak, Pinchos | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/28/2025 |
| Gilani, Ahmed | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/28/2025 |
| Gilani, Ahmed | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/28/2025 |
| Glen Oak 11, LLC | Organization | Limited Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/28/2025 |
| Goldberger, Shlomo | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/28/2025 |
| JMH Family LLC | Organization | Limited Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/28/2025 |
| JMH Family Trust | Organization | Limited Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/28/2025 |
| Malt Family Trust | Organization | Limited Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/28/2025 |
| Miller, Nachum | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/28/2025 |
| Miller, Nachum | Individual | Limited Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/28/2025 |
Showing 20 of 34 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 14 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Atlas Healthcare — 29 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 28 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sudbury Pines Extended Care | 1.8 mi | Sudbury, MA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| St Patrick's Manor | 2.1 mi | Framingham, MA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Vantage at Sudbury LLC | 2.2 mi | Sudbury, MA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Casa de Ramana Rehabilitation Center | 3.4 mi | Framingham, MA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Royal Wayland Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 3.5 mi | Wayland, MA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Carlyle House | 3.6 mi | Framingham, MA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Alliance Health at Marie Esther | 4.1 mi | Marlborough, MA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Beaumont Rehab & Skilled Nursing Ctr - Natick | 4.3 mi | Natick, MA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Eliot Center for Health and Rehabilitation | 4.5 mi | Natick, MA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Bethany Skilled Nursing Facility | 4.8 mi | Framingham, MA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Mary Ann Morse Nursing & Rehabilitation | 5.9 mi | Natick, MA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Campion Health & Wellness, INC | 6.0 mi | Weston, MA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Middlesex, MA — 72 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 225682.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details