Beaumont Rehab & Skilled Nursing Ctr - Natick
3 Vision Drive, Natick, MA 01760 · Middlesex County · 53 certified beds · avg 48 residents/day · certified since Jun 2, 1997
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 17, 2024 · F-0656 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Feb 14, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 17, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Feb 14, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (9)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Sep 16, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings. · from a complaint |
| Jan 7, 2025 | B · Minimal risk, repeated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. |
| Jan 7, 2025 | B · Minimal risk, repeated | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. |
| Jun 4, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint |
| Jan 17, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint |
| Jan 17, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Nov 16, 2023 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. |
| Nov 16, 2023 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 1).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 3 | 2 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
1 fine totaling $10,517.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2024 | Fine | $10,517 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Massachusetts avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.04 | 3.89 | 3.95 | top 31% in Massachusetts; top 38% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.34 | 0.65 | 0.69 | bottom 8% in Massachusetts; bottom 14% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.71 | 3.51 | 3.50 | top 28% in Massachusetts; top 33% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.20 | 0.46 | 0.48 | bottom 9% in Massachusetts; bottom 12% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 32.5 | 38.2 | 45.8 | top 35% in Massachusetts; top 19% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 0.0 | 42.6 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.71, RN 0.31, weekend 3.41. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Partnership
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salmon, Daniel | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 69% | 04/01/1997 |
| Baker, Nicholas | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/05/2021 |
| Continuing Care Management LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/25/2012 |
| Salmon, Daniel | Individual | General Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/07/2005 |
| Salmon, Matthew | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/21/1995 |
| Salmon, Matthew | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2015 |
| Tuffy, Robert | Individual | General Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2005 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "How do you train staff to treat residents with dignity, and how do you protect residents' personal belongings?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "Where do you post your daily staffing numbers, and can I see today's?"
- "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
- "How many hours a day is a registered nurse physically in the building, including weekends?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Royal Wayland Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 1.1 mi | Wayland, MA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Mary Ann Morse Nursing & Rehabilitation | 1.7 mi | Natick, MA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Eliot Center for Health and Rehabilitation | 1.9 mi | Natick, MA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Adviniacare Newton Wellesley | 3.0 mi | Wellesley, MA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Riverbend of South Natick | 3.1 mi | S Natick, MA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| St Patrick's Manor | 3.8 mi | Framingham, MA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Casa de Ramana Rehabilitation Center | 3.9 mi | Framingham, MA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Oak Knoll Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 4.3 mi | Framingham, MA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Bethany Skilled Nursing Facility | 4.5 mi | Framingham, MA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Carlyle House | 4.6 mi | Framingham, MA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Vantage at Sudbury LLC | 4.7 mi | Sudbury, MA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Elizabeth Seton | 4.8 mi | Wellesley, MA | ★★★★☆ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 225727.