MassachusettsFramingham

Carlyle House

342 Winter Street, Framingham, MA 01701 · Middlesex County · 55 certified beds · avg 49 residents/day · certified since Dec 1, 1991

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
4
Serious findings on record
$25,263
Fines, last 3 years
4.64
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Mar 3, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Mar 14, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Mar 3, 2025 · F-0700 · triggered by a complaint

The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.

Why it matters: Improperly used bed rails can trap or injure residents — in the worst cases, causing serious harm.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Mar 14, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 27, 2026 · F-0656 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.

Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Feb 25, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 27, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Feb 25, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (22)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 27, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Jan 27, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jul 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jul 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jul 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jul 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jul 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Mar 3, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Mar 3, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · from a complaint
Mar 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
May 1, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
May 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
May 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from.
May 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
May 1, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Nov 7, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Nov 7, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Nov 7, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Nov 7, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Nov 7, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Nov 7, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202260D
202460F
202582J ▲
202622G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $25,263.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jan 27, 2026Fine$9,110
Mar 3, 2025Fine$16,153

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMassachusetts avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.643.893.95top 13% in Massachusetts; top 20% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.450.650.69bottom 23% in Massachusetts; bottom 30% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.033.513.50top 17% in Massachusetts; top 22% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.280.460.48bottom 22% in Massachusetts; bottom 28% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)42.938.245.8bottom 31% in Massachusetts; top 44% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)57.142.642.9bottom 23% in Massachusetts; bottom 26% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.36, RN 0.43, weekend 3.79. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Morgan, ChristopherIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest7%02/06/1997
Morgan, JosephIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest85%02/06/1997
Morgan, MichaelIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest7%02/06/1997
Anand, AjayIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Anand, AjayIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Benedetti, JohnIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/09/2009
Benedetti, JohnIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/09/2009
Cliftonlarsonallen LLPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/15/2025
Droeske, KristenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/17/2021
Droeske, KristenIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/17/2021
Legrand, OmarIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/04/1998
Legrand, SusanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/03/2002
Morgan, JanetIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/30/1997
Morgan, JosephIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE02/06/1997
Morgan, JosephIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/06/1997
Newport Real Estate Capital LLCOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Rizik, ShantalIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/15/2024
Romano, LaurenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/16/2024
Romano, LaurenIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/16/2024
Shea, MaryIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/15/1995

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Casa de Ramana Rehabilitation Center0.7 miFramingham, MA★★★★☆4/5
Bethany Skilled Nursing Facility1.4 miFramingham, MA★★★★★5/5
St Patrick's Manor1.6 miFramingham, MA★★★★☆3/5
Eliot Center for Health and Rehabilitation3.3 miNatick, MA★★★☆☆3/5
Oak Knoll Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center3.6 miFramingham, MA★★★☆☆3/5
Waterview Lodge LLC, Rehabilitation & Healthcare3.6 miAshland, MA★★★☆☆2/5
Beaumont Rehab & Skilled Nursing Ctr - Natick4.6 miNatick, MA★★★★☆4/5
Royal Wayland Rehabilitation and Nursing Center4.6 miWayland, MA★★★★★5/5
Sudbury Pines Extended Care5.0 miSudbury, MA★★☆☆☆2/5
Alliance Health at Marie Esther5.3 miMarlborough, MA★★★★☆4/5
Mary Ann Morse Nursing & Rehabilitation5.5 miNatick, MA★★★★★4/5
Vantage at Sudbury LLC5.7 miSudbury, MA★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Framingham →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 225541.