MassachusettsFramingham

Casa de Ramana Rehabilitation Center

485 Franklin Street, Framingham, MA 01702 · Middlesex County · 124 certified beds · avg 106 residents/day · certified since Apr 23, 1969

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$8,512
Fines, last 3 years
3.73
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Sep 3, 2024 · F-0604 · triggered by a complaint

The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment.

Why it matters: Unneeded restraints can cause injuries, muscle loss, and deep emotional distress.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Sep 27, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (12)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Nov 26, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Nov 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Nov 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
Nov 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Nov 26, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Nov 26, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Sep 3, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · from a complaint
Sep 3, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint
Sep 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Sep 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Sep 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Sep 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.

Inspection trend by year

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202340D
202481G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $8,512.

DateTypeAmount / length
Sep 3, 2024Fine$8,512

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMassachusetts avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.733.893.95bottom 49% in Massachusetts; bottom 48% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.690.650.69top 33% in Massachusetts; top 37% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.353.513.50bottom 47% in Massachusetts; bottom 50% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.320.460.48bottom 32% in Massachusetts; bottom 37% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)24.138.245.8top 11% in Massachusetts; top 6% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)33.342.642.9top 31% in Massachusetts; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.58, RN 0.66, weekend 3.22. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Castro, MichaelIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest33%08/01/2019
Raso, StevenIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest33%08/01/2019
Solimine, PaulIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest33%08/01/2019
Cooper, StephenIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2019
LandmarkOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2019

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Carlyle House0.7 miFramingham, MA★☆☆☆☆2/5
St Patrick's Manor1.2 miFramingham, MA★★★★☆3/5
Bethany Skilled Nursing Facility1.4 miFramingham, MA★★★★★5/5
Eliot Center for Health and Rehabilitation2.6 miNatick, MA★★★☆☆3/5
Oak Knoll Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center3.4 miFramingham, MA★★★☆☆3/5
Beaumont Rehab & Skilled Nursing Ctr - Natick3.9 miNatick, MA★★★★☆4/5
Royal Wayland Rehabilitation and Nursing Center3.9 miWayland, MA★★★★★5/5
Waterview Lodge LLC, Rehabilitation & Healthcare4.2 miAshland, MA★★★☆☆2/5
Mary Ann Morse Nursing & Rehabilitation4.8 miNatick, MA★★★★★4/5
Sudbury Pines Extended Care4.9 miSudbury, MA★★☆☆☆2/5
Vantage at Sudbury LLC5.3 miSudbury, MA★★☆☆☆2/5
Alliance Health at Marie Esther5.6 miMarlborough, MA★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Framingham →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 225179.