MassachusettsFramingham

Oak Knoll Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center

9 Arbetter Drive, Framingham, MA 01701 · Middlesex County · 123 certified beds · avg 111 residents/day · certified since Nov 20, 1995

Part of chain: ATLAS HEALTHCARE (29 facilities, chain avg rating 3.6★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$211,819
Fines, last 3 years
3.43
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jun 12, 2025 · F-0656 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.

Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jun 12, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jun 12, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jun 12, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (27)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 13, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 12, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Jun 12, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Oct 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Oct 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment.
Oct 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Oct 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Oct 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not notify the appropriate authorities when a resident with a mental disorder or intellectual disability had a significant change in condition.
Oct 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Oct 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Oct 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Oct 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Oct 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 28, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Aug 28, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
Aug 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Aug 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not notify the appropriate authorities when a resident with a mental disorder or intellectual disability had a significant change in condition.
Aug 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Aug 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Aug 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Aug 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Aug 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Aug 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Aug 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have an agreement with an approved laboratory to provide lab services, even though it doesn't offer lab services on site.
Aug 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service.
Aug 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (10 → 1).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023140E
2024100D
202522J ▲
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $211,819.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jun 12, 2025Fine$211,819

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMassachusetts avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.433.893.95bottom 28% in Massachusetts; bottom 33% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.300.650.69bottom 5% in Massachusetts; bottom 9% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.013.513.50bottom 23% in Massachusetts; bottom 32% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.190.460.48bottom 8% in Massachusetts; bottom 11% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)41.438.245.8bottom 37% in Massachusetts; top 40% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)52.642.642.9bottom 29% in Massachusetts; bottom 32% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.79, RN 0.33, weekend 3.33. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
JMH Family LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/28/2025
JMH Family TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/28/2025
Miller, NachumIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/28/2025
MLS Family LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/28/2025
MLS Family TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/28/2025
SGS Family LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/28/2025
SGS Family TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/28/2025
Whittier 6 Operations Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/28/2025
Whittier Mop Operations Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%02/28/2025
Bak, PinchosIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2025
Bak, PinchosIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2025
Gilani, AhmedIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2025
Gilani, AhmedIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2025
Glen Oak 11, LLCOrganizationLimited Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2025
Goldberger, ShlomoIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2025
JMH Family LLCOrganizationLimited Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2025
JMH Family TrustOrganizationLimited Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2025
Malt Family TrustOrganizationLimited Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2025
Miller, NachumIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2025
Miller, NachumIndividualLimited Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Sudbury Pines Extended Care1.8 miSudbury, MA★★☆☆☆2/5
St Patrick's Manor2.1 miFramingham, MA★★★★☆3/5
Vantage at Sudbury LLC2.2 miSudbury, MA★★☆☆☆2/5
Casa de Ramana Rehabilitation Center3.4 miFramingham, MA★★★★☆4/5
Royal Wayland Rehabilitation and Nursing Center3.5 miWayland, MA★★★★★5/5
Carlyle House3.6 miFramingham, MA★☆☆☆☆2/5
Alliance Health at Marie Esther4.1 miMarlborough, MA★★★★☆4/5
Beaumont Rehab & Skilled Nursing Ctr - Natick4.3 miNatick, MA★★★★☆4/5
Eliot Center for Health and Rehabilitation4.5 miNatick, MA★★★☆☆3/5
Bethany Skilled Nursing Facility4.8 miFramingham, MA★★★★★5/5
Mary Ann Morse Nursing & Rehabilitation5.9 miNatick, MA★★★★★4/5
Campion Health & Wellness, INC6.0 miWeston, MA★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Framingham →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 225682.