How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
1680 Molalla Avenue, Oregon City, OR 97045 (opens Google Maps) · Clackamas County · (503) 655-2588· 102 certified beds · avg 50 residents/day · certified since Oct 16, 1990 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: MARQUIS COMPANIES (15 facilities, chain avg rating 4.3★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 13 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. F-0689
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint F-0584
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 27, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Oct 24, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Oct 24, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · from a complaint · F-0759 |
| Oct 24, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761 |
| Oct 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Oct 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint · F-0641 |
| Oct 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · from a complaint · F-0676 |
| Jul 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Aug 30, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Aug 30, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Aug 30, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Aug 30, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 2).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 4 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 7 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 2 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Oregon avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.60 | 5.42 | 3.95 | top 34% in Oregon; top 6% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.64 | 0.78 | 0.69 | bottom 46% in Oregon; top 43% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 5.03 | 4.85 | 3.50 | top 33% in Oregon; top 6% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.32 | 0.48 | 0.48 | bottom 33% in Oregon; bottom 36% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 24.7 | 47.4 | 45.8 | top 4% in Oregon; top 7% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 25.0 | 51.6 | 42.9 | top 12% in Oregon; top 20% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.05, RN 0.58, weekend 4.54.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (5.05 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Marquis Oregon City Post Acute Rehab. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fogg, Phillip | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 100% | 06/22/2012 |
| Marquis Companies I, INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 04/01/2013 |
| Bucher, Amy | Individual | Contracted Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2013 |
| Bucher, Amy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2013 |
| Fogg, Phillip | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/22/2012 |
| Fogg, Steven | Individual | Contracted Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2013 |
| Fogg, Steven | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/22/2012 |
| Fogg, Steven | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2013 |
| Levee, Kathleen | Individual | Contracted Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2013 |
| Levee, Kathleen | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2013 |
| Marquis Companies I, INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2013 |
| Olum, April | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2013 |
| Tone, Staci | Individual | Contracted Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2013 |
| Tone, Staci | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2013 |
All 14 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Marquis Companies — 15 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 14 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rivercrest Post Acute | 0.6 mi | Oregon City, OR | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Avamere Rehabilitation of Oregon City | 1.5 mi | Oregon City, OR | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Avamere Rehabilitation of Clackamas | 3.5 mi | Gladstone, OR | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Rose Linn Care Center | 3.7 mi | West Linn, OR | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Fernwood Supportive Living at Madrona Grove | 7.0 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Willamette View Health Center | 7.2 mi | Milwaukie, OR | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Stanley Post Acute | 7.2 mi | Milwaukie, OR | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Marquis Hope Village | 7.6 mi | Canby, OR | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| The Pearl at Kruse Way | 8.7 mi | Lake Oswego, OR | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Marquis Wilsonville Post Acute Rehab | 9.1 mi | Wilsonville, OR | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Marquis Tualatin Post Acute Rehab | 9.2 mi | Tualatin, OR | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Cascade Terrace Post Acute | 10.6 mi | Portland, OR | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Clackamas, OR — 13 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 385221.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details