OregonGresham

Fairlawn Health and Rehabilitation of Cascadia

3457 NE Division Street, Gresham, OR 97030 · Multnomah County · 82 certified beds · avg 75 residents/day · certified since Jun 14, 1976

Part of chain: CASCADIA HEALTHCARE (46 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.11
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 21, 2020 · F-0760

The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.

Why it matters: A serious medication error can cause real harm, hospitalization, or worse.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 11, 2020 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (27)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 27, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 27, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 27, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Dec 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Dec 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly plan a resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs after leaving. · from a complaint
Dec 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Dec 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Nov 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offWhen a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care. · from a complaint
Nov 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
May 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Oct 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Aug 29, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Jan 21, 2020▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Jan 21, 2020F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 21, 2020E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman.
Jan 21, 2020E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Jan 21, 2020E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Jan 21, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jan 21, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Jan 21, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Jan 21, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 21, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Jan 21, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jan 21, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Jan 21, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Jan 21, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (4 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2020141G ▲
202320D
202480E
202630F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOregon avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.115.423.95bottom 30% in Oregon; top 12% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.910.780.69top 23% in Oregon; top 20% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.614.853.50bottom 36% in Oregon; top 11% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.660.480.48top 17% in Oregon; top 19% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)33.747.445.8top 14% in Oregon; top 21% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)30.851.642.9top 19% in Oregon; top 30% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.76, RN 0.84, weekend 4.29. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Cascadia HC Group LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2025
Cascadia Healthcare LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
Cascadia Holdco LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2025
Cascadia Oregon Operations LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
Hammond, OwenIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
Laforte, StephenIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2025
Nelson, TimothyIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2025
Cascadia HC Group LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2025
Cascadia Healthcare LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
Cascadia Holdco LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2025
Cascadia Oregon Operations LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
Cascadia Services LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/30/2022
Cascadia Services LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/10/2025
Gresham 3457 Realty, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2025
Gresham 3457 Realty, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2025
Hammond, OwenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
Laforte, StephenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2025
Nelson, TimothyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2025
Vellody, NitaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2024
Vellody, NitaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/26/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Gresham Post Acute Care and Rehabilitation1.5 miGresham, OR★★☆☆☆2/5
Regency Gresham Nursing & Rehabilitation Center1.9 miGresham, OR★★★★★4/5
Village Manor of Cascadia2.5 miWood Village, OR★★★★☆3/5
Marquis Centennial Post Acute Rehab3.0 miPortland, OR★★★★★4/5
Village Health Care4.0 miGresham, OR★★☆☆☆2/5
Lacamas Creek Post Acute5.8 miCamas, WA★★★★★5/5
Cedar Crossings6.1 miPortland, OR★★★☆☆2/5
Avalon Care Center - Portland6.3 miPortland, OR★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Portland Health and Rehabilitation6.8 miPortland, OR★☆☆☆☆1/5
Cascade Terrace Post Acute7.0 miPortland, OR★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Menlo Park Post Acute7.0 miPortland, OR★★☆☆☆2/5
Rose City Nursing and Rehabilitation7.5 miPortland, OR★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Gresham →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 385133.