How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Jones Harrison Residence
3700 Cedar Lake Avenue, Minneapolis, MN 55416 (opens Google Maps) · Hennepin County · (612) 920-2030· 120 certified beds · avg 108 residents/day · certified since Apr 1, 1987 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: EBENEZER SENIOR LIVING (6 facilities, chain avg rating 3.5★)
2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jan 9, 2026
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Jul 2, 2026
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.42
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jul 2, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jul 2, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 30 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. F-0605
The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. F-0609
View all 30 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jan 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. · F-0605 |
| Jan 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Jan 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610 |
| Jan 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Jan 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Jan 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jan 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Jan 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from. · F-0699 |
| Jan 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jan 9, 2026 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. · F-0851 |
| Jul 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Jul 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Nov 14, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Nov 14, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Nov 14, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Nov 14, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from. · from a complaint · F-0699 |
| Nov 14, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Nov 14, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| Nov 14, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status. · F-0887 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · from a complaint · F-0655 |
| Mar 4, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755 |
| Dec 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| Dec 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Dec 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Dec 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Dec 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Dec 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents. · F-0790 |
| Dec 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| Dec 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 10).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 11
Serious citations (G–L): 1
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 8 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 9 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 11 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityMinnesota averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 5.42
Minnesota average: 4.83
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 1.71
Minnesota average: 1.22
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 5.01
Minnesota average: 4.27
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Minnesota avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.42 | 4.83 | 3.95 | top 20% in Minnesota; top 8% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.71 | 1.22 | 0.69 | top 12% in Minnesota; top 3% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 5.01 | 4.27 | 3.50 | top 14% in Minnesota; top 6% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 1.13 | 0.69 | 0.48 | top 11% in Minnesota; top 4% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 28.4 | 42.2 | 45.8 | top 18% in Minnesota; top 12% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 46.3 | 38.6 | 42.9 | bottom 33% in Minnesota; bottom 41% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.71, RN 1.48, weekend 4.35.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.71 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Jones Harrison Residence. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bell, Brittany | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| Chebli, Yasser | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2023 |
| Chebli, Yasser | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/21/2025 |
| Christopher, Mackenzie | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/06/2018 |
| Christopher, Mackenzie | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/21/2025 |
| Dimick, Martha | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| Dimick, Martha | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| Diracles, Marcia | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| Diracles, Marcia | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| Ebenezer Management Services INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| Ebenezer Management Services INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/30/2025 |
| Harwood, Taylor | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| Harwood, Taylor | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| Kilburg, Elizabeth | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| Kilburg, Elizabeth | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| Kimpton, Jeffrey | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| Kimpton, Jeffrey | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| Olafson, Michael | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| Olafson, Michael | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| Stich, Leah | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
Showing 20 of 24 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 4 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Ebenezer Senior Living — 6 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Martin Luther Care Center — Bloomington, MN · overall 2/5
- Meadows on Fairview — Wyoming, MN · overall 4/5
- Aurora on France — Edina, MN · overall 4/5
- Ebenezer Integrated Care & Rehab — Saint Paul, MN · overall 4/5
- Ebenezer Ridges Geriatric Care Center — Burnsville, MN · overall 4/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "What percentage of your residents are on antipsychotic or sedating medications, and how do you work to reduce that?"
- "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
- "If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "How do you assess and manage residents' pain, especially for those who have trouble communicating?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 28% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 24 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 99 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Villas at the Park | 0.9 mi | Saint Louis Park, MN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Southside Care Center | 1.8 mi | Minneapolis, MN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Birchwood Care Home | 1.9 mi | Minneapolis, MN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Redeemer Health Care Center | 2.0 mi | Minneapolis, MN | ★★★★★ | 3/5 | |
| Villas at Bryn Mawr LLC | 2.0 mi | Minneapolis, MN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Lakehouse Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center | 2.1 mi | Minneapolis, MN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Villas at St Louis Park | 2.5 mi | Saint Louis Park, MN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Grand Avenue Rest Home | 2.6 mi | Minneapolis, MN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Estates at Chateau LLC | 2.6 mi | Minneapolis, MN | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Villas at the Cedars | 2.6 mi | Saint Louis Park, MN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Estates at St Louis Park LLC | 2.8 mi | Saint Louis Park, MN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Benedictine Health Center of Minneapolis | 3.0 mi | Minneapolis, MN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Hennepin, MN — 54 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Lake Minnetonka Shores — Spring Park, MN · overall 5/5
- Maranatha Care Center — Brooklyn Center, MN · overall 4/5
- Martin Luther Care Center — Bloomington, MN · overall 2/5
- Minnesota Masonic Home Care Center — Bloomington, MN · overall 5/5
- Mission Nursing Home — Plymouth, MN · overall 1/5abuse
- MN Veterans Home-Mpls — Minneapolis, MN · overall 3/5
- Mount Olivet Careview Home — Minneapolis, MN · overall 4/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245460.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).