PennsylvaniaHanover

Homewood Living Plum Creek, INC

425 Westminster Avenue, Hanover, PA 17331 · York County · 120 certified beds · avg 101 residents/day · certified since Apr 10, 1993

Part of chain: HOMEWOOD RETIREMENT CENTERS (4 facilities, chain avg rating 4.3★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$7,443
Fines, last 3 years
4.84
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Aug 30, 2023 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Aug 28, 2023 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (10)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 23, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Jan 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jan 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jan 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Feb 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Feb 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Feb 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Aug 30, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 1).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202311G ▲
202430D
202560E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $7,443.

DateTypeAmount / length
Aug 30, 2023Fine$7,443

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityPennsylvania avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.843.943.95top 16% in Pennsylvania; top 16% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.840.800.69top 31% in Pennsylvania; top 24% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.373.583.50top 16% in Pennsylvania; top 14% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.420.560.48bottom 47% in Pennsylvania; top 45% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)26.544.545.8top 9% in Pennsylvania; top 9% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)38.939.942.9bottom 50% in Pennsylvania; top 45% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.14, RN 0.72, weekend 3.74. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Becker, DouglasIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Bittinger, AllenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015
Bradley, BuffyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/16/2000
Coleman, KarenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Coleman, KarenIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Crampton, WendyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2019
Livelsberger, JohnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
McKonly, StevenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Miller, RichardIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/15/2021
Peck, MichaelIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Peck, MichaelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/08/2025
Rothrock, ThadIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2019

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Hanover Hall for Nursing and Rehabilitation0.7 miHanover, PA★★☆☆☆2/5
Concordia at Spiritrust Utz Terrace3.9 miHanover, PA★★★★★4/5
Cross Keys Village-Brethren Home Community, the8.4 miNew Oxford, PA★★★★☆4/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Long View10.0 miManchester, MD★★★★☆4/5
Gettysburg Center12.3 miGettysburg, PA★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
Concordia at Spiritrust Gettysburg12.9 miGettysburg, PA★★★★★4/5
Lorien Taneytown, INC13.3 miTaneytown, MD★★★☆☆3/5
Transitions Healthcare Gettysburg13.3 miGettysburg, PA★★★☆☆3/5
Gardens at Gettysburg, the14.7 miGettysburg, PA★★★★☆4/5
Atlee Hill Health and Rehab Center15.8 miWestminster, MD★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Hanover →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395898.