Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: THE BEEBE FAMILY (48 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Aug 20, 2025
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Apr 11, 2024
$11,333
Fines, last 3 years
3.95
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Apr 11, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Apr 8, 2002 (Past Non-Compliance)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 17 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. F-0688
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. F-0908
View all 17 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
Date
Severity
What the facility was cited for
Aug 20, 2025
E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688
Aug 20, 2025
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Aug 20, 2025
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · F-0908
Aug 20, 2025
C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread
The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732
Feb 4, 2025
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580
Feb 4, 2025
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609
Aug 7, 2024
E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Aug 7, 2024
E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880
Aug 7, 2024
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641
Aug 7, 2024
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint · F-0690
Aug 7, 2024
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Aug 7, 2024
C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread
The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732
Apr 11, 2024
▲ G · Actual harm, isolated
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689
Apr 11, 2024
E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580
Apr 11, 2024
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656
Sep 27, 2023
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
Sep 27, 2023
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 4).
Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations:
2
Serious citations (G–L):
0
2024
All citations:
9
Serious citations (G–L):
1
2025
All citations:
6
Serious citations (G–L):
0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
Year
Citations
Serious (G–L)
Worst severity that year
2023
2
0
D
2024
9
1
G ▲
2025
6
0
E
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
Date
Type
Amount / length
Apr 11, 2024
Fine
$11,333
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityLouisiana averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility:
3.95
Louisiana average:
4.04
U.S. average:
3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility:
0.42
Louisiana average:
0.32
U.S. average:
0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility:
3.11
Louisiana average:
3.45
U.S. average:
3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
Measure
This facility
Louisiana avg
U.S. avg
Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
3.95
4.04
3.95
bottom 48% in Louisiana; top 42% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours
0.42
0.32
0.69
top 12% in Louisiana; bottom 25% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing
3.11
3.45
3.50
bottom 32% in Louisiana; bottom 37% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)
0.27
0.20
0.48
top 12% in Louisiana; bottom 27% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)
45.6
47.6
45.8
top 46% in Louisiana; bottom 48% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)
0.0
41.6
42.9
top 1% in Louisiana; top 1% in the U.S.
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.72, RN 0.39, weekend 2.93.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.72 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Heritage Manor of Slidell. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
QSST Tr for Alison Beebe Sadler Danos and Her Descendants
Organization
Indirect Ownership Interest
NOT APPLICABLE
11/01/2013
QSST Tr for Felicia Beebe Stallard and Her Descendants
Organization
Indirect Ownership Interest
NOT APPLICABLE
11/01/2013
Account Management Services INC
Organization
Operational/Managerial Control
NOT APPLICABLE
01/01/2010
Account Management Services INC
Organization
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
01/01/2010
Administrative Systems INC
Organization
Operational/Managerial Control
NOT APPLICABLE
01/01/2010
Administrative Systems INC
Organization
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
01/01/2010
Alisons 2016 Fam Tr No 2
Organization
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
01/01/2025
Aria Care Management LLC
Organization
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
12/01/2022
Bankston, Bolden
Individual
Operational/Managerial Control
NOT APPLICABLE
03/15/2001
Bankston, Bolden
Individual
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
03/15/2001
Beebe 2013 Childrens Tr NG
Organization
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
01/01/2025
Beebe, Bobby
Individual
Operational/Managerial Control
NOT APPLICABLE
12/11/2021
Beebe, Bobby
Individual
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
12/11/2021
Beebe, Elton
Individual
Operational/Managerial Control
NOT APPLICABLE
01/01/2009
Casey, Michael
Individual
Operational/Managerial Control
NOT APPLICABLE
01/01/2009
Casey, Michael
Individual
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
01/01/2009
Felicias 2016 Fam Tr No 2
Organization
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
01/01/2025
Louisiana Extended Care Centers LLC
Organization
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
01/01/2025
Showing 20 of 39 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 19 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain The Beebe Family — 48 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
CMS records place this facility in St. Tammany, LA — 9 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 195220.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
The Care File
Visit checklist — Heritage Manor of Slidell
106 Medical Center Drive, Slidell, LA 70461 · (985) 643-0307
Health inspection rating 4/5 · CMS overall 4/5· Fines (3y): $11,333
Most serious findings on record:
▲ Apr 11, 2024 (F-0689, Actual harm, isolated): The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Questions for the administrator:
☐ "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
☐ "What do you do daily to keep residents moving, and how do you help residents at risk of losing mobility?"
☐ "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
☐ "How do you inspect and maintain essential equipment, and how quickly are repairs made?"
☐ "Where do you post your daily staffing numbers, and can I see today's?"
☐ "If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
☐ "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Louisiana midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
☐ "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
☐ "CMS reports 46% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
☐ "The ownership record on file lists 39 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
☐ "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
While you're there, notice:
☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)
Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 195220 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)