Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: THE BEEBE FAMILY (48 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Feb 11, 2026
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Feb 8, 2024
$13,625
Fines, last 3 years
3.89
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Feb 8, 2024 · F-0578
The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Why it matters: Ignoring these rights means residents may receive treatments they refused, or miss having their end-of-life wishes respected.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 15, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 15 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. F-0694
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. F-0695
View all 15 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
Date
Severity
What the facility was cited for
Feb 11, 2026
E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Feb 11, 2026
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · F-0694
Feb 11, 2026
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695
Jan 30, 2025
E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658
Jan 30, 2025
E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759
Jan 30, 2025
E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760
Jan 30, 2025
E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Jan 30, 2025
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641
Jan 30, 2025
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
Feb 8, 2024
▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated
The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578
Feb 8, 2024
E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658
Feb 8, 2024
E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Feb 8, 2024
E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Feb 8, 2024
E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Feb 8, 2024
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 3).
Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2024
All citations:
6
Serious citations (G–L):
1
2025
All citations:
6
Serious citations (G–L):
0
2026
All citations:
3
Serious citations (G–L):
0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
Year
Citations
Serious (G–L)
Worst severity that year
2024
6
1
J ▲
2025
6
0
E
2026
3
0
E
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
1 fine totaling $13,625, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
Date
Type
Amount / length
Feb 8, 2024
Fine
$13,625
Feb 8, 2024
Payment Denial
9 days from Mar 6, 2024
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityLouisiana averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility:
3.89
Louisiana average:
4.04
U.S. average:
3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility:
0.25
Louisiana average:
0.32
U.S. average:
0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility:
3.18
Louisiana average:
3.45
U.S. average:
3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
Measure
This facility
Louisiana avg
U.S. avg
Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
3.89
4.04
3.95
bottom 45% in Louisiana; top 44% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours
0.25
0.32
0.69
bottom 46% in Louisiana; bottom 6% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing
3.18
3.45
3.50
bottom 36% in Louisiana; bottom 40% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)
0.10
0.20
0.48
bottom 17% in Louisiana; bottom 1% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)
52.2
47.6
45.8
bottom 32% in Louisiana; bottom 31% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)
45.5
41.6
42.9
bottom 41% in Louisiana; bottom 43% in the U.S.
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.94, RN 0.26, weekend 3.22.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.94 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Forest Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Elton Glynn Beebe Jr. & Nancy Doty Beebe Irrv Tr Ua
Organization
5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
5%
01/01/2010
Gerard and Alison Danos Childrens Tr
Organization
5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
—
01/01/2010
Joseph & Alison Sadler Children Tr
Organization
5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
—
01/01/2010
Medico LLC
Organization
5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest
85%
01/01/2010
Account Management Services INC
Organization
Operational/Managerial Control
NOT APPLICABLE
01/01/2010
Account Management Services INC
Organization
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
01/01/2010
Administrative Systems INC
Organization
Operational/Managerial Control
NOT APPLICABLE
01/01/2010
Administrative Systems INC
Organization
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
01/01/2010
Aria Care Management LLC
Organization
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
08/01/2022
Beebe, Bobby
Individual
Operational/Managerial Control
NOT APPLICABLE
12/11/2021
Beebe, Bobby
Individual
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
12/11/2021
Beebe, Elton
Individual
Operational/Managerial Control
NOT APPLICABLE
01/01/2010
Beebe, Elton
Individual
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
01/01/2025
Forest Manor LLC
Organization
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
01/01/2025
LTC Him Consulting INC
Organization
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
05/28/2007
McClanahan, Matthew
Individual
Operational/Managerial Control
NOT APPLICABLE
12/18/2023
McClanahan, Matthew
Individual
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
12/18/2023
Medico LLC
Organization
Operational/Managerial Control
NOT APPLICABLE
01/01/2010
Showing 20 of 42 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 22 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain The Beebe Family — 48 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
CMS records place this facility in St. Tammany, LA — 9 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.