2020 W. Main Street, Ville Platte, LA 70586 (opens Google Maps) · Evangeline County · (337) 363-5532· 124 certified beds · avg 110 residents/day · certified since Nov 16, 2000 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: THE BEEBE FAMILY (48 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Sep 17, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Sep 13, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)
Showing the latest 3 of 20 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. F-0558
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint F-0609
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Jan 29, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Dec 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| May 29, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint · F-0641 |
| May 29, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · from a complaint · F-0655 |
| May 29, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint · F-0657 |
| May 29, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658 |
| Oct 30, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| Oct 30, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Oct 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Oct 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · F-0676 |
| Oct 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Oct 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. · F-0851 |
| Sep 17, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Apr 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Oct 11, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Oct 11, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Oct 11, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Oct 11, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly plan a resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs after leaving. · F-0660 |
| Oct 11, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 2).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 5 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 8 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 5 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 2 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $11,022.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2024 | Fine | $11,022 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Louisiana avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.11 | 4.04 | 3.95 | top 44% in Louisiana; top 35% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.37 | 0.32 | 0.69 | top 21% in Louisiana; bottom 18% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.28 | 3.45 | 3.50 | bottom 41% in Louisiana; bottom 46% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.08 | 0.20 | 0.48 | bottom 7% in Louisiana; bottom 1% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 36.9 | 47.6 | 45.8 | top 20% in Louisiana; top 29% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 25.0 | 41.6 | 42.9 | top 26% in Louisiana; top 20% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.09, RN 0.37, weekend 3.26.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.09 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Heritage Manor of Ville Platte. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Act Investments, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 15% | 01/01/2010 |
| David & Felicia Stallard Child Tr | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 5% | 01/01/2010 |
| Elton Glynn Beebe Jr. & Nancy Doty Beebe Irrv Tr Ua | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 5% | 01/01/2010 |
| Gerard and Alison Danos Childrens Tr | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 01/01/2010 |
| Joseph & Alison Sadler Children Tr | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 01/01/2010 |
| Medico LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 85% | 01/01/2010 |
| Account Management Services INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2010 |
| Account Management Services INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2010 |
| Administrative Systems INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2010 |
| Administrative Systems INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2010 |
| Beebe, Bobby | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2013 |
| Beebe, Bobby | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2013 |
| Beebe, Elton | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2010 |
| Beebe, Elton | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Fontenot, Thomas | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2000 |
| Fontenot, Thomas | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2000 |
| Medico LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2010 |
| Parkinson, Toni | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2011 |
| Parkinson, Toni | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2010 |
| Parkinson, Toni | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2010 |
Showing 20 of 37 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 17 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain The Beebe Family — 48 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 47 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Savoy Care Center | 7.6 mi | Mamou, LA | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Prairie Manor Nursing Home | 8.9 mi | Pine Prairie, LA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Eunice Manor | 14.6 mi | Eunice, LA | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Oak Lane Wellness & Rehabilitative Center | 15.6 mi | Eunice, LA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Our Lady of Prompt Succor Nursing Facility | 16.9 mi | Opelousas, LA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Heritage Manor of Opelousas | 17.4 mi | Opelousas, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Bayou Vista Nursing and Rehab Center | 19.2 mi | Bunkie, LA | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Senior Village Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 19.9 mi | Opelousas, LA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Evangeline, LA — 4 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 195507.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details