How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Golden Gate Rehabilitation & Health Care Center
191 Bradley Avenue, Staten Island, NY 10314 (opens Google Maps) · Richmond County · (718) 698-8800· 238 certified beds · avg 229 residents/day · certified since May 1, 1976 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: BENJAMIN LANDA (48 facilities, chain avg rating 3.4★)
1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected May 29, 2024
3
Serious findings on record
most recent Mar 3, 2022
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.68
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5 · how star ratings work →
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, pattern · Mar 3, 2022 · F-0600
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, pattern · Mar 3, 2022 · F-0600
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (K): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was a pattern: more than a limited occurrence, without being widespread. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Apr 28, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, pattern · Mar 3, 2022 · F-0610
The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, pattern · Mar 3, 2022 · F-0610
The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Why it matters: When allegations aren't investigated, harm to residents can continue unchecked.
Severity (K): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was a pattern: more than a limited occurrence, without being widespread. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Apr 28, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Mar 3, 2022 · F-0608
The facility did not have working policies to ensure employees report any suspected crime against a resident on time, to post notices of employees' reporting rights, and to prevent retaliation against staff who report.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Mar 3, 2022 · F-0608
The facility did not have working policies to ensure employees report any suspected crime against a resident on time, to post notices of employees' reporting rights, and to prevent retaliation against staff who report.
Why it matters: If staff can't safely report suspected crimes, harm to residents may go unreported and unpunished.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Apr 28, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 18 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. F-0804
The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. F-0641
The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint F-0658
View all 18 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| May 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| May 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658 |
| May 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| May 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Nov 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Nov 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | When a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care. · from a complaint · F-0661 |
| Mar 3, 2022 | ▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, pattern | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · F-0600 |
| Mar 3, 2022 | ▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, pattern | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610 |
| Mar 3, 2022 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not have working policies to ensure employees report any suspected crime against a resident on time, to post notices of employees' reporting rights, and to prevent retaliation against staff who report. · F-0608 |
| Mar 3, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Mar 3, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Mar 3, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jun 27, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Jun 27, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids. · F-0685 |
| Jun 27, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit. · F-0711 |
| Jun 27, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Jun 27, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 5).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2019
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2022
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 3
2023
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 5 | 0 | D |
| 2022 | 6 | 3 | K ▲ |
| 2023 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 5 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityNew York averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 2.68
New York average: 3.58
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.64
New York average: 0.68
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.48
New York average: 3.13
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New York avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.68 | 3.58 | 3.95 | bottom 8% in New York; bottom 6% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.69 | top 39% in New York; top 43% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.48 | 3.13 | 3.50 | bottom 14% in New York; bottom 9% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.53 | 0.48 | 0.48 | top 27% in New York; top 30% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 27.7 | 40.3 | 45.8 | top 21% in New York; top 11% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 30.0 | 39.8 | 42.9 | top 29% in New York; top 29% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.81, RN 0.67, weekend 2.60.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (2.81 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Golden Gate Rehabilitation & Health Care Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estate of Deborah Philipson | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 29% | 06/03/2022 |
| Estate of Mayer Rispler | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 5% | 06/06/2022 |
| Estate of Deborah Philipson | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/03/2022 |
| Estate of Mayer Rispler | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/06/2022 |
| Hoffner, Judah | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/24/2013 |
| Hoffner, Judah | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/24/2013 |
| Landa, Benjamin | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2001 |
| Landa, Benjamin | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2001 |
| Landa, Benjamin | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2001 |
| Ripoll, Lucinda | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2001 |
| Ripoll, Lucinda | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2001 |
All 11 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Benjamin Landa — 48 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Meadow Park Rehabilitation and Health Center LLC — Flushing, NY · overall 5/5
- Pinnacle Multicare Nursing and Rehabilitation Cent — Bronx, NY · overall 3/5
- Premier Nursing and Rehab Center of Far Rockaway — Far Rockaway, NY · overall 3/5
- Rockville Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, — Rockville Center, NY · overall 5/5
- Spring Creek Rehabilitation & Nursing Care Center — Brooklyn, NY · overall 4/5
- The Five Towns Premier Rehabilitation & Nursing Ce — Woodmere, NY · overall 2/5
- Arcadia Health and Rehabilitation Center — Pensacola, FL · overall 5/5
- Bay Breeze Rehabilitation by Harborview — Gulf Breeze, FL · overall 3/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 47 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
- "What happens, step by step, when a staff member suspects a resident has been harmed or a crime has occurred?"
- "Could I join residents for a meal to see the food quality and temperature for myself?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "Does a pharmacist review every resident's medications and chart monthly, and how are their concerns acted on?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the New York midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 28% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 224 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clove Lakes Health Care and Rehabilitation Center, | 0.5 mi | Staten Island, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Sea View Hospital Rehabilitation Center and Home | 0.9 mi | Staten Island, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Archcare at Eger Health Care and Rehabilitation Ce | 1.9 mi | Staten Island, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Carmel Richmond Healthcare and Rehabilitation Cent | 2.3 mi | Staten Island, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Silver Lake Specialized Rehabilitation and Care Ce | 2.8 mi | Staten Island, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Richmond Center for Rehabilitation and Specialty H | 3.0 mi | Staten Island, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Verrazano Nursing and Post-Acute Center | 3.0 mi | Staten Island, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Staten Island Care Center | 3.0 mi | Staten Island, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| New Vanderbilt Rehabilitation and Care Center, INC | 3.1 mi | Staten Island, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Bayonne University Hospital | 4.3 mi | Bayonne, NJ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Trinitas Hospital | 5.0 mi | Elizabeth, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Hamilton Park Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 5.7 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335502.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).