Silver Lake Specialized Rehabilitation and Care Ce

275 Castleton Avenue, Staten Island, NY 10301 (opens Google Maps) · Richmond County · (718) 447-7800· 278 certified beds · avg 188 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1971 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

2/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

inspected Dec 13, 2023

Serious findings on record

most recent Apr 16, 2026

Fines, last 3 years

3.08

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →

⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, isolated · Apr 16, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Jun 15, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 17 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

Apr 16, 2026G · Actual harm, isolated
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
Apr 16, 2026E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint F-0657
Apr 16, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint F-0609

View all 17 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Apr 16, 2026	▲ G · Actual harm, isolated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689
Apr 16, 2026	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint · F-0657
Apr 16, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609
Apr 16, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684
Apr 16, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755
Dec 23, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600
Dec 23, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609
Dec 13, 2023	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584
Dec 13, 2023	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Dec 13, 2023	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Dec 13, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550
Dec 13, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences. · F-0553
Dec 13, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641
Sep 13, 2019	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657
Sep 13, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679
Sep 13, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758
Sep 13, 2019	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880

Inspection trend by year

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

All citationsSerious citations (G–L)

2019

2023

2025

2026

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2019	4	0	E
2023	6	0	E
2025	2	0	D
2026	5	1	G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

This facilityNew York averageU.S. average

Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)

3.08

3.58

3.95

Registered Nurse hours

0.90

0.68

0.69

Weekend total nurse staffing

2.83

3.13

3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Measure	This facility	New York avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.08	3.58	3.95	bottom 30% in New York; bottom 17% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.90	0.68	0.69	top 15% in New York; top 21% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	2.83	3.13	3.50	bottom 40% in New York; bottom 22% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	1.02	0.48	0.48	top 6% in New York; top 6% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	25.8	40.3	45.8	top 16% in New York; top 8% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	30.8	39.8	42.9	top 32% in New York; top 30% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.09, RN 1.19, weekend 3.75.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.09 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Silver Lake Specialized Rehabilitation and Care Ce. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Kraus, Simone	Individual	Direct Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2008
Weingarten, Hershie	Individual	Direct Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	11/05/2025
Weingarten, Rosemarie	Individual	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	9%	05/31/2015
Emmer, Louis	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2019
Emmer, Louis	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2019
Kraus, Michael	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2018
Kraus, Michael	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2018
Kraus, Michael	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2018
Kraus, Michael	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/03/2018
Kraus, Simone	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2008
Plecha, Pawel	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2016
Questel, Lori	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	08/22/1983
Torricelli, Tina	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	05/01/2018
Torricelli, Tina	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	05/01/2018
Totillo, Gianna	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	12/02/2024
Weingarten, Hershie	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2023
Weingarten, Rosemarie	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2008

All 17 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
"When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
"How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
"How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
"Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
"Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"

Also worth asking anywhere

"Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the New York midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
"Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
"CMS reports 26% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
"The ownership record on file lists 17 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
"Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 251 within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Verrazano Nursing and Post-Acute Center	0.3 mi	Staten Island, NY	★★☆☆☆	3/5
Staten Island Care Center	0.5 mi	Staten Island, NY	★★★★★	4/5
Richmond Center for Rehabilitation and Specialty H	1.1 mi	Staten Island, NY	★★☆☆☆	2/5
New Vanderbilt Rehabilitation and Care Center, INC	1.2 mi	Staten Island, NY	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Clove Lakes Health Care and Rehabilitation Center,	2.4 mi	Staten Island, NY	★★☆☆☆	1/5	abuse
Carmel Richmond Healthcare and Rehabilitation Cent	2.6 mi	Staten Island, NY	★★★★★	4/5
Bayonne University Hospital	2.7 mi	Bayonne, NJ	★★★★★	5/5
Golden Gate Rehabilitation & Health Care Center	2.8 mi	Staten Island, NY	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Sea View Hospital Rehabilitation Center and Home	3.5 mi	Staten Island, NY	★★★★★	4/5
Hamilton Park Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	3.8 mi	Brooklyn, NY	★★★★☆	3/5
Archcare at Eger Health Care and Rehabilitation Ce	4.3 mi	Staten Island, NY	★★★★☆	3/5
Peace Care St Ann's	4.3 mi	Jersey City, NJ	★★☆☆☆	2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Staten Island →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335196.