1050 Central Avenue, Woodmere, NY 11598 (opens Google Maps) · Nassau County · (516) 374-9300· 336 certified beds · avg 275 residents/day · certified since Dec 11, 1991 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: BENJAMIN LANDA (48 facilities, chain avg rating 3.4★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Nov 20, 2025 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jan 6, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 17 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint F-0610
The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint F-0580
The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · from a complaint F-0698
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Jun 18, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580 |
| Jun 18, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · from a complaint · F-0698 |
| Nov 20, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Nov 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Nov 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Nov 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Nov 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Nov 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 15, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Feb 15, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Feb 15, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Feb 15, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Feb 15, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Feb 15, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Nov 9, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Nov 9, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 5).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2023 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 5 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 1 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 3 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $8,278.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2025 | Fine | $8,278 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New York avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.51 | 3.58 | 3.95 | bottom 3% in New York; bottom 4% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.61 | 0.68 | 0.69 | top 44% in New York; top 48% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.33 | 3.13 | 3.50 | bottom 7% in New York; bottom 5% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.66 | 0.48 | 0.48 | top 18% in New York; top 18% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | — | 40.3 | 45.8 | — |
| RN turnover (%) | — | 39.8 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.52, RN 0.85, weekend 3.27.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.52 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for The Five Towns Premier Rehabilitation & Nursing Ce. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estate of Deborah Philipson | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 18% | 06/03/2022 |
| Gottlieb, Mikols | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 22% | 01/04/2010 |
| Janklowicz, Jack | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 5% | 01/04/2010 |
| Janklowicz, Leonard | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 6% | 01/04/2010 |
| Pollak, Renee | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 10% | 01/04/2010 |
| Saffran, Malke | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 01/04/2010 |
| Benden, Joseph | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/18/2018 |
| Fischel, Mayer | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/04/2010 |
| Janklowicz, Jack | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/04/2010 |
| Janklowicz, Leonard | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/04/2010 |
| Landa, Benjamin | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/04/2010 |
| Landa, Benjamin | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/04/2010 |
| Pollak, Renee | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/04/2010 |
| Saffran, Malke | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/04/2010 |
All 14 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Benjamin Landa — 48 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 47 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lynbrook Restorative Therapy and Nursing | 2.5 mi | Lunbrook, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Oceanview Nursing & Rehabilitation Care Center | 3.0 mi | Far Rockaway, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Haven Manor Health Care Center, LLC | 3.1 mi | Far Rockaway, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| West Lawrence Care Center, L L C | 3.1 mi | Far Rockaway, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Queens Nassau Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 3.2 mi | Far Rockaway, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Brookhaven Rehab & Health Care Center L L C | 3.3 mi | Far Rockaway, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Premier Nursing and Rehab Center of Far Rockaway | 3.3 mi | Far Rockaway, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Far Rockaway Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing | 3.4 mi | Far Rockaway, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Peninsula Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 3.4 mi | Far Rockaway, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Bezalel Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 3.4 mi | Far Rockaway, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Beach Gardens Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 3.4 mi | Far Rockaway, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| The Grand Rehabilitation and Nursing at South Poin | 3.5 mi | Island Park, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Nassau, NY — 36 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335718.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details