How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
741 Chambersburg Road, Gettysburg, PA 17325 (opens Google Maps) · Adams County · (717) 334-6764· 102 certified beds · avg 95 residents/day · certified since Sep 30, 1968 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: PRIORITY HEALTHCARE GROUP (12 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 17 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. F-0607
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. F-0684
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · F-0607 |
| Jun 4, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jun 4, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| May 15, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| May 15, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| May 15, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Nov 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit. · from a complaint · F-0711 |
| Jun 27, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Jun 27, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Jun 27, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Jun 27, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility admitted a resident without a doctor's order, or did not make sure each resident stayed under a doctor's ongoing care. · F-0710 |
| Jun 27, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| May 22, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| May 22, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686 |
| May 22, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755 |
| Feb 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658 |
| Sep 28, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint · F-0725 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (3 → 3).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 10 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 3 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 3 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Pennsylvania avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.92 | 3.94 | 3.95 | bottom 8% in Pennsylvania; bottom 11% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.65 | 0.80 | 0.69 | top 49% in Pennsylvania; top 42% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.77 | 3.58 | 3.50 | bottom 14% in Pennsylvania; bottom 19% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.53 | 0.56 | 0.48 | top 37% in Pennsylvania; top 29% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 56.8 | 44.5 | 45.8 | bottom 17% in Pennsylvania; bottom 22% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 52.6 | 39.9 | 42.9 | bottom 26% in Pennsylvania; bottom 32% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.10, RN 0.69, weekend 2.94.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.10 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Gardens at Gettysburg, the. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blglpa LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 14% | 10/27/2017 |
| Fair Oaks Family Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 14% | 01/28/2020 |
| Hashtag Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 02/01/2017 |
| Hashtag-El-Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 17% | 10/27/2017 |
| Samara Holdings Company LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 17% | 01/28/2020 |
| Sebbag, Gabriel | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 5% | 10/27/2017 |
| Strawberry Hill Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 17% | 01/28/2020 |
| Clabaugh, Tammy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/30/2025 |
| Clabaugh, Tammy | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/30/2025 |
| Clinical Consulting Services LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Clinical Consulting Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/15/2025 |
| Khan, Muzafar | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2025 |
| Khan, Muzafar | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2025 |
| Priority Care Group LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Priority Care Group LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/31/2025 |
| Schiowitz, Marc | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Schiowitz, Marc | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Summation Financial Services LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Summation Financial Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/15/2025 |
All 19 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Priority Healthcare Group — 12 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 11 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transitions Healthcare Gettysburg | 1.4 mi | Gettysburg, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Concordia at Spiritrust Gettysburg | 2.2 mi | Gettysburg, PA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Gettysburg Center | 2.5 mi | Gettysburg, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Cross Keys Village-Brethren Home Community, the | 10.2 mi | New Oxford, PA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Paramount Nursing and Rehab at Fayetteville, LLC | 10.6 mi | Fayetteville, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| South Mountain Restoration Cen | 11.5 mi | South Mountain, PA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Lorien Taneytown, INC | 14.4 mi | Taneytown, MD | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Hanover Hall for Nursing and Rehabilitation | 14.6 mi | Hanover, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Homewood Living Plum Creek, INC | 14.7 mi | Hanover, PA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Quincy Retirement Community | 17.1 mi | Waynesboro, PA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Concordia at Spiritrust Luther Ridge | 18.1 mi | Chambersburg, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Concordia at Spiritrust Utz Terrace | 18.2 mi | Hanover, PA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Adams, PA — 8 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395247.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details