1801 Folkemer Circle, York, PA 17404 (opens Google Maps) · Adams County · (717) 767-5404· 104 certified beds · avg 62 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1984 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Oct 23, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Nov 30, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Oct 23, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Nov 30, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 19 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. F-0605
The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. F-0835
The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. F-0851
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. · F-0605 |
| Nov 6, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · F-0835 |
| Nov 6, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. · F-0851 |
| Nov 6, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Nov 6, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Nov 6, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Nov 6, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Nov 6, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Nov 6, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636 |
| Nov 6, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Nov 6, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Nov 6, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from. · F-0699 |
| Nov 6, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Oct 23, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Oct 23, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jan 4, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Jan 4, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jan 4, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Jan 4, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care. · F-0791 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (12 → 1).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18 | 2 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
2 fines totaling $24,670.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2024 | Fine | $12,335 |
| Oct 23, 2024 | Fine | $12,335 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Pennsylvania avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.83 | 3.94 | 3.95 | top 43% in Pennsylvania; top 47% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.67 | 0.80 | 0.69 | top 47% in Pennsylvania; top 39% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.55 | 3.58 | 3.50 | top 40% in Pennsylvania; top 40% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.46 | 0.56 | 0.48 | top 47% in Pennsylvania; top 38% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 47.9 | 44.5 | 45.8 | bottom 39% in Pennsylvania; bottom 42% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 58.3 | 39.9 | 42.9 | bottom 17% in Pennsylvania; bottom 24% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.56, RN 0.62, weekend 3.30.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.56 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Concordia at Spiritrust Sprenkle Drive. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bowen, Robert | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/31/2007 |
| Bowen, Robert | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/31/2007 |
| Combs, Stanley | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Combs, Stanley | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Dunlop, James | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2013 |
| Dunlop, James | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2013 |
| Frownfelter, Melissa | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2022 |
| Frownfelter, Melissa | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2022 |
| Kessler, Stephanie | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Kessler, Stephanie | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Neinstedt, William | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Neinstedt, William | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Peck, Michael | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/12/2025 |
| Peck, Michael | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/08/2025 |
| Sarvis, Karly | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2022 |
| Sarvis, Karly | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/27/2025 |
| Smeltzer, Samantha | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2020 |
| Smeltzer, Samantha | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2020 |
| Stout, Kevin | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Stout, Kevin | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
Showing 20 of 28 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 8 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| York North Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Ctr | 1.7 mi | York, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Normandie Ridge | 1.9 mi | York, PA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Margaret E. Moul Home | 1.9 mi | York, PA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Yorkview Nursing and Rehabilitation | 3.5 mi | York, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Rest Haven-York | 3.6 mi | York, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Pleasant Acres Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 3.6 mi | York, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Kingston Court Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation | 4.1 mi | York, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Misericordia Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 4.2 mi | York, PA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| York South Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Ctr | 5.4 mi | York, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Inners Creek Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Ce | 8.5 mi | Dallastown, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Emerald Nursing and Rehabilitation | 13.3 mi | Elizabethtown, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Elizabethtown Nursing and Rehabilitation | 13.4 mi | Elizabethtown, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Adams, PA — 8 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395612.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details