Nursing and Rehabilitation at the Mansion
1040-52 Market Street, Sunbury, PA 17801 · Northumberlnd County · 70 certified beds · avg 66 residents/day · certified since Oct 1, 1980
Part of chain: PRIORITY HEALTHCARE GROUP (12 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$10,033
Fines, last 3 years
3.38
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 19, 2024 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Oct 9, 2023 (Past Non-Compliance)
All citations in the current public record (32)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Dec 19, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide a neutral and fair arbitration process. Arbitration is a way of settling disputes outside of court, and if it's used, the facility must agree with the resident on a neutral arbitrator and a convenient location. |
| Dec 19, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. |
| Dec 19, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. |
| Dec 19, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. |
| Dec 19, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Dec 19, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. |
| Dec 19, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. |
| Dec 19, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Dec 27, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint |
| Nov 15, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| Nov 15, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. |
| Nov 15, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. |
| Nov 15, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Nov 15, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. |
| Nov 15, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Nov 15, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. |
| Nov 15, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Nov 15, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. |
| Nov 15, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Feb 23, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint |
| Jan 19, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Jan 19, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Jan 19, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Jan 19, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. |
| Jan 19, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. |
| Jan 19, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. |
| Jan 19, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience. |
| Jan 19, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Jan 19, 2024 | C · Minimal risk, facility-wide | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. |
| Jan 19, 2024 | C · Minimal risk, facility-wide | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. |
| Dec 6, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (10 → 9).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 22 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 9 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
1 fine totaling $10,033.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2024 | Fine | $10,033 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Pennsylvania avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.38 | 3.94 | 3.95 | bottom 34% in Pennsylvania; bottom 30% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.73 | 0.80 | 0.69 | top 41% in Pennsylvania; top 34% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.06 | 3.58 | 3.50 | bottom 32% in Pennsylvania; bottom 34% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.47 | 0.56 | 0.48 | top 45% in Pennsylvania; top 36% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 20.8 | 44.5 | 45.8 | top 3% in Pennsylvania; top 3% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 11.1 | 39.9 | 42.9 | top 5% in Pennsylvania; top 4% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.27, RN 0.70, weekend 2.95. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blglpa LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 14% | 10/27/2017 |
| Fair Oaks Family Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 14% | 01/28/2020 |
| Hashtag Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 02/01/2017 |
| Hashtag-El-Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 17% | 10/27/2017 |
| Samara Holdings Company LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 17% | 01/28/2020 |
| Sebbag, Gabriel | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 5% | 10/27/2017 |
| Strawberry Hill Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 17% | 01/28/2020 |
| Clinical Consulting Services LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Clinical Consulting Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/04/2025 |
| Gamzeh, David | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/04/2025 |
| Glatzer, Akiva | Individual | General Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/27/2017 |
| GPH Sunbury LP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2017 |
| Greatorex, Tina | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/04/2025 |
| Monahan, Mark | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2017 |
| Monahan, Mark | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/05/2026 |
| Pagana, Charles | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2003 |
| Pagana, Charles | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/16/2025 |
| Priority Care Group LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Schiowitz, Marc | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Schiowitz, Marc | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Does your admission agreement include an arbitration clause, and is signing it optional?"
- "How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
- "How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
- "How do you coordinate and monitor care for residents who receive dialysis?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sunbury Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 0.2 mi | Sunbury, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Nottingham Village | 3.5 mi | Northumberland, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Manor at Penn Village, the | 5.3 mi | Selinsgrove, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Buffalo Valley Lutheran Villag | 9.8 mi | Lewisburg, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Oak Glen Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center | 10.5 mi | Lewisburg, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Milton Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 10.9 mi | Milton, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Mountain View Rehabilitation and Senior Living Ctr | 12.3 mi | Coal Township, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Emmanuel Center for Nursing | 12.7 mi | Danville, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Grandview Nursing and Rehabilitation | 13.0 mi | Danville, PA | —/5 | SFF | |
| Watsontown Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 16.5 mi | Watsontown, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Mount Carmel Senior Living Community | 18.3 mi | Mt Carmel, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395482.