Paramount Nursing and Rehab at Fayetteville, LLC
6375 Chambersburg Road, Fayetteville, PA 17222 · Franklin County · 92 certified beds · avg 85 residents/day · certified since Dec 1, 1986
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Oct 6, 2025 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.
Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.
Corrected: Oct 31, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Oct 6, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.
Corrected: Oct 31, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (26)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint |
| Oct 6, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Jun 5, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. |
| Jun 5, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. |
| Jun 5, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Jun 5, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. |
| Jun 5, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from. |
| Jun 5, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Jun 5, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Mar 10, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint |
| Jul 3, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. |
| Jul 3, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. |
| Jul 3, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. |
| Jul 3, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. |
| Jul 3, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. |
| Jul 3, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| Jul 3, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Aug 10, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. |
| Aug 10, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. |
| Aug 10, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Aug 10, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility hired someone with an official finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft against them. Facilities are not allowed to employ people with such findings. |
| Aug 10, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. |
| Aug 10, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | When a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care. |
| Aug 10, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. |
| Aug 10, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| Aug 10, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (7 → 7).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 9 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 7 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 10 | 2 | J ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
2 fines totaling $17,345.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2025 | Fine | $8,672 |
| Oct 6, 2025 | Fine | $8,673 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Pennsylvania avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.51 | 3.94 | 3.95 | bottom 43% in Pennsylvania; bottom 37% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.43 | 0.80 | 0.69 | bottom 14% in Pennsylvania; bottom 27% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.20 | 3.58 | 3.50 | bottom 43% in Pennsylvania; bottom 42% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.29 | 0.56 | 0.48 | bottom 18% in Pennsylvania; bottom 29% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 40.7 | 44.5 | 45.8 | top 38% in Pennsylvania; top 38% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 12.5 | 39.9 | 42.9 | top 6% in Pennsylvania; top 6% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.44, RN 0.42, weekend 3.14. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cox, James | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 100% | 01/01/2018 |
| Paramount Health Holdings Group INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 01/01/2017 |
| Cox, James | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/21/2017 |
| Cox, James | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Cox, James | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Darmstadter, Chase | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/21/2017 |
| Decort, Ryan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2024 |
| Paramount Health Holdings Group INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Paramount Health Holdings Group INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Paramount Health Resources INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Paramount Health Resources INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Randler, Melissa | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/27/2020 |
| Randler, Melissa | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/27/2020 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "What percentage of your residents are on antipsychotic or sedating medications, and how do you work to reduce that?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "How do you care for residents with incontinence or catheters, and what do you do to prevent urinary tract infections?"
- "How do you learn about each resident's background and history, and how does that shape their care?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| South Mountain Restoration Cen | 4.8 mi | South Mountain, PA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Concordia at Spiritrust Luther Ridge | 7.5 mi | Chambersburg, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Quincy Retirement Community | 9.8 mi | Waynesboro, PA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Laurel Lakes Rehabilitation and Wellness Center | 10.1 mi | Chambersburg, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Gardens at Gettysburg, the | 10.6 mi | Gettysburg, PA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Menno Haven Rehabilitation Center | 10.8 mi | Chambersburg, PA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Brookview Health Care Center | 10.9 mi | Chambersburg, PA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Chambersburg Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Ce | 11.1 mi | Chambersburg, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Shippensburg Rehabilitation and Health Care Center | 11.4 mi | Shippensburg, PA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Chambers Pointe Health Care Center | 11.5 mi | Chambersburg, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Transitions Healthcare Shook Home | 11.8 mi | Chambersburg, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Transitions Healthcare Gettysburg | 11.9 mi | Gettysburg, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
All facilities in Fayetteville →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395721.