Family of Caring at Teaneck LLC

1104 Teaneck Road, Teaneck, NJ 07666 (opens Google Maps) · Bergen County · (201) 833-2400· 107 certified beds · avg 98 residents/day · certified since Jul 23, 1968 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: FAMILY OF CARING HEALTHCARE (8 facilities, chain avg rating 3.8★)

4/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

inspected Dec 2, 2025

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

3.61

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 18 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

Dec 2, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). F-0628
Dec 2, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. F-0550
Dec 2, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. F-0658

View all 18 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Dec 2, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · F-0628
Dec 2, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550
Dec 2, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658
Dec 2, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684
Dec 2, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686
Dec 2, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693
Dec 2, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Dec 2, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Dec 2, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921
May 16, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · from a complaint · F-0700
Dec 16, 2021	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Dec 16, 2021	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610
Dec 16, 2021	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658
Dec 16, 2021	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688
Dec 16, 2021	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Dec 16, 2021	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842
Dec 16, 2021	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Dec 16, 2021	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 9).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

All citationsSerious citations (G–L)

2021

2024

2025

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2021	8	F
2024	1	D
2025	9	E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

This facilityNew Jersey averageU.S. average

Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)

3.61

3.88

3.95

Registered Nurse hours

0.86

0.67

0.69

Weekend total nurse staffing

3.13

3.53

3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Measure	This facility	New Jersey avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.61	3.88	3.95	bottom 46% in New Jersey; bottom 42% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.86	0.67	0.69	top 20% in New Jersey; top 23% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	3.13	3.53	3.50	bottom 36% in New Jersey; bottom 38% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.60	0.50	0.48	top 22% in New Jersey; top 23% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	30.4	39.7	45.8	top 26% in New Jersey; top 15% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	34.8	37.7	42.9	top 46% in New Jersey; top 38% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.70, RN 0.88, weekend 3.21.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.70 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Family of Caring at Teaneck LLC. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Deutsch, Rachel	Individual	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	—	12/05/2022
Family of Caring at Teaneck LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	—	12/05/2022
Friedman, Allen	Individual	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	—	12/05/2022
Friedman, Jerry	Individual	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	—	12/02/2022
Friedman, Mark	Individual	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	—	12/05/2022
Friedman, Nathan	Individual	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	—	12/05/2022
Friedman, Edward	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	12/05/2022
Friedman, Edward	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	12/05/2022
Friedman, Jerry	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	12/05/2022
Friedman, Jerry	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/31/2025

All 10 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Family of Caring Healthcare — 8 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Family of Caring Healthcare at Montclair — Montclair, NJ · overall 4/5
Family of Caring Healthcare at Ridgewood — Ridgewood, NJ · overall 5/5
Family of Caring Healthcare at Tenafly, LLC — Tenafly, NJ · overall 3/5
Woodcliff Lake Health & Rehabilitation Center — Woodcliff Lake, NJ · overall 5/5
Advanced Subacute Rehabilitation Center at Sewell — Sewell, NJ · overall 2/5
Barnert Subacute Rehabilitation Center, LLC — Paterson, NJ · overall 4/5
Dellridge Health & Rehabilitation Center — Paramus, NJ · overall 3/5

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"
"Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
"Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
"How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
"How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
"How do you decide when a feeding tube is truly needed, and how do staff care for residents who have one?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"

Also worth asking anywhere

"Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the New Jersey midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
"Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
"CMS reports 30% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
"Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 279 within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection
Careone at Teaneck	1.1 mi	Teaneck, NJ	★★★★☆	3/5
Complete Care at Inglemoor, LLC	1.5 mi	Englewood, NJ	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Actors Fund Home	1.9 mi	Englewood, NJ	★★★★☆	4/5
Careone at Wellington	2.2 mi	Hackensack, NJ	★★★☆☆	2/5
Complete Care at Prospect Heights LLC	2.6 mi	Hackensack, NJ	★★☆☆☆	1/5
Careone at New Milford	2.8 mi	New Milford, NJ	★★★☆☆	2/5
Complete Care at Regent LLC	2.9 mi	Hackensack, NJ	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Family of Caring Healthcare at Tenafly, LLC	3.3 mi	Tenafly, NJ	★★★☆☆	3/5
Atlas Rehabilitation and Healthcare at Maywood	3.4 mi	Maywood, NJ	★★★★☆	3/5
Alaris Health at the Chateau	3.8 mi	Rochelle Park, NJ	★★☆☆☆	3/5
Careone at Cresskill	4.2 mi	Cresskill, NJ	★★★★☆	3/5
Fort Tryon Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing	4.3 mi	New York, NY	★★★★★	4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Bergen, NJ — 29 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Family of Caring Healthcare at Ridgewood — Ridgewood, NJ · overall 5/5
Jewish Home at Rockleigh — Rockleigh, NJ · overall 4/5
Maple Glen Center — Fairlawn, NJ · overall 4/5
New Jersey Veterans Memorial Home at Paramus — Paramus, NJ · overall 5/5
Oakland Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Oakland, NJ · overall 3/5
Ridgewood Center — Ridgewood, NJ · overall 1/5
Woodcliff Lake Health & Rehabilitation Center — Woodcliff Lake, NJ · overall 5/5

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Teaneck →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315037.

This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).

The Care File

Visit checklist — Family of Caring at Teaneck LLC

1104 Teaneck Road, Teaneck, NJ 07666 · (201) 833-2400

Health inspection rating 4/5 · CMS overall 4/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"
☐ "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
☐ "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
☐ "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
☐ "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
☐ "How do you decide when a feeding tube is truly needed, and how do staff care for residents who have one?"
☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
☐ "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the New Jersey midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
☐ "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
☐ "CMS reports 30% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
☐ "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 315037 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)