How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
304 S. Van Dien Ave, Ridgewood, NJ 07450 (opens Google Maps) · Bergen County · (201) 445-8200· 96 certified beds · avg 90 residents/day · certified since May 1, 1998 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: FAMILY OF CARING HEALTHCARE (8 facilities, chain avg rating 3.8★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 16 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. F-0584
The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. F-0658
The facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit. F-0711
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| May 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| May 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit. · F-0711 |
| May 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| May 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Mar 2, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Mar 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | When a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care. · F-0661 |
| Mar 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Mar 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure its nurse aides were properly trained — aides working more than 4 months must be trained and competent, and newer aides must be enrolled in training. · F-0728 |
| Mar 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
| Mar 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Mar 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide or obtain x-rays and other imaging tests when ordered, or did not promptly tell the ordering doctor the results. · F-0777 |
| Mar 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Mar 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program. · F-0882 |
| Mar 4, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Mar 4, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (9 → 5).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 9 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 5 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New Jersey avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.36 | 3.88 | 3.95 | bottom 28% in New Jersey; bottom 29% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.88 | 0.67 | 0.69 | top 19% in New Jersey; top 22% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.20 | 3.53 | 3.50 | bottom 42% in New Jersey; bottom 42% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.99 | 0.50 | 0.48 | top 4% in New Jersey; top 6% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 31.6 | 39.7 | 45.8 | top 28% in New Jersey; top 17% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 22.7 | 37.7 | 42.9 | top 22% in New Jersey; top 18% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.39, RN 1.15, weekend 4.19.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.39 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Family of Caring Healthcare at Ridgewood. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Family of Caring Healthcare at Ridgewood, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 10/04/2018 |
| Friedman, Nathan | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 10/04/2018 |
| Friedman, Edward | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/04/2018 |
| Friedman, Edward | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/04/2018 |
All 4 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Family of Caring Healthcare — 8 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bergen New Bridge Medical Center | 0.8 mi | Paramus, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Ridgewood Center | 1.7 mi | Ridgewood, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Maple Glen Center | 1.9 mi | Fairlawn, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| New Jersey Veterans Memorial Home at Paramus | 2.4 mi | Paramus, NJ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Careone at Ridgewood Avenue | 2.4 mi | Paramus, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Dellridge Health & Rehabilitation Center | 2.7 mi | Paramus, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Christian Health Care Center | 3.6 mi | Wyckoff, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Complete Care at Fair Lawn Edge | 3.8 mi | Paterson, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Barnert Subacute Rehabilitation Center, LLC | 3.8 mi | Paterson, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Careone at Oradell | 4.0 mi | Oradell, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Windmere | 4.1 mi | North Haledon, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Emerson Health Care Center | 4.1 mi | Emerson, NJ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Bergen, NJ — 29 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315434.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details