How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
175 West Hudson Ave, Englewood, NJ 07631 (opens Google Maps) · Bergen County · (201) 510-3430· 107 certified beds · avg 95 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1998 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 15 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition. F-0638
The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. F-0657
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jul 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition. · F-0638 |
| Jul 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Jul 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Jul 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Jul 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760 |
| Jul 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · from a complaint · F-0814 |
| Jul 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Feb 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
| Feb 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Feb 5, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Feb 5, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| Oct 28, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Oct 28, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows. · F-0808 |
| Oct 28, 2021 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · F-0637 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 8).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 4 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 8 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New Jersey avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.35 | 3.88 | 3.95 | top 7% in New Jersey; top 9% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.93 | 0.67 | 0.69 | top 16% in New Jersey; top 19% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.87 | 3.53 | 3.50 | top 8% in New Jersey; top 7% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.61 | 0.50 | 0.48 | top 22% in New Jersey; top 22% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 15.8 | 39.7 | 45.8 | top 3% in New Jersey; top 1% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 11.1 | 37.7 | 42.9 | top 4% in New Jersey; top 4% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.96, RN 0.86, weekend 4.52.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.96 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Actors Fund Home. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actors Fund of America | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 01/01/1966 |
| Jathavedam, Ashwin | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/06/2026 |
| Park, Grace | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/06/2024 |
| Strohl, Jordan | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/02/2008 |
| Strohl, Jordan | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/02/2008 |
| Strohl, Jordan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/06/2026 |
All 6 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Family of Caring Healthcare at Tenafly, LLC | 1.5 mi | Tenafly, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Family of Caring at Teaneck LLC | 1.9 mi | Teaneck, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Complete Care at Inglemoor, LLC | 2.0 mi | Englewood, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Careone at Cresskill | 2.4 mi | Cresskill, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Careone at New Milford | 2.9 mi | New Milford, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Careone at Teaneck | 2.9 mi | Teaneck, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Hebrew Home for the Aged at Riverdale | 3.5 mi | Riverdale, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Independence Care Center for Nursing and Rehabilit | 3.6 mi | Riverdale, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Schervier Nursing Care Center | 3.6 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Hudson Pointe at Riverdale Center for Nursing and | 3.7 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| New Riverdale Rehab and Nursing | 3.7 mi | Bronx, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Careone at Wellington | 3.9 mi | Hackensack, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Bergen, NJ — 29 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315377.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details