New Jersey ›Egg Harbor Township
6818 Delilah Road, Egg Harbor Township, NJ 08234 (opens Google Maps) · Atlantic County · (609) 453-3200· 120 certified beds · avg 118 residents/day · certified since Sep 3, 2013 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: EXCELCARE (8 facilities, chain avg rating 2.3★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Jan 31, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Dec 30, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)
Showing the latest 3 of 21 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint F-0677
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. F-0550
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Jan 31, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jan 31, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Jan 31, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Jan 31, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Jan 31, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Jan 31, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658 |
| Jan 31, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jan 31, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Apr 3, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Apr 3, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Apr 3, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Apr 3, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Apr 3, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Apr 3, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Apr 3, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Apr 3, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| Apr 3, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
| Apr 3, 2023 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Apr 21, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Apr 21, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (10 → 8).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 10 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 8 | 1 | J ▲ |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $18,119.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2025 | Fine | $18,119 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New Jersey avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.31 | 3.88 | 3.95 | bottom 25% in New Jersey; bottom 27% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.51 | 0.67 | 0.69 | bottom 43% in New Jersey; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.99 | 3.53 | 3.50 | bottom 24% in New Jersey; bottom 30% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.42 | 0.50 | 0.48 | top 47% in New Jersey; top 46% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 70.8 | 39.7 | 45.8 | bottom 2% in New Jersey; bottom 5% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 55.6 | 37.7 | 42.9 | bottom 16% in New Jersey; bottom 28% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.53, RN 0.54, weekend 3.19.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.53 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Excel Care at Egg Harbor. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Berkowitz, Sam | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 12/27/2021 |
| Frankel, Eliyahu | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 40% | 12/27/2021 |
| Ornstein, Marton | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 8% | 12/27/2021 |
| Tzufon LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 12% | 12/27/2021 |
| ZBL Regency Opco, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 60% | 12/27/2021 |
| American Care Nursing Services | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/27/2021 |
| Attentive Healthcare LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/27/2021 |
| Frankel, Eliyahu | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/27/2021 |
| Frankel, Eliyahu | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/27/2021 |
| Henry, Derrick | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/04/2023 |
| Henry, Derrick | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/04/2023 |
| Kelly, Brendan | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/27/2021 |
| Kelly, Brendan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/27/2021 |
| Loffler, Abraham | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/13/2025 |
| Martin Friedman Cpa, P.C. | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/27/2021 |
| Twomagnets LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/27/2021 |
| ZBL Regency Opco, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/27/2021 |
All 17 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Excelcare — 8 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Our Ladys Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare | 2.2 mi | Pleasantville, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Meadowview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 2.3 mi | Northfield, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Preferred Care at Absecon | 2.7 mi | Absecon, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Atlas Healthcare at Seashore Gardens | 4.4 mi | Galloway Township, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Health Center at Galloway, the | 4.5 mi | Galloway Township, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Royal Suites Health Care & Rehabilitation | 4.5 mi | Galloway Township, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Complete Care at Linwood, LLC | 5.5 mi | Linwood, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Excel Care at the Pines | 6.9 mi | Atlantic City, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| United Methodist Communities at the Shores | 10.6 mi | Ocean City, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Seacrest Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 14.0 mi | Little Egg Harbor TW, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Mystic Meadows Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 17.4 mi | Little Egg Harbor TW, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Autumn Lake Healthcare at Oceanview | 17.5 mi | Ocean View, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Atlantic, NJ — 10 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315514.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details