How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
140 Park Ave, East Orange, NJ 07017 (opens Google Maps) · Essex County · (973) 677-1500· 215 certified beds · avg 206 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 1981 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: COMPLETE CARE (85 facilities, chain avg rating 3.1★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 24 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not make sure residents actually saw their doctor face-to-face at all required visits. Doctors must examine nursing home residents in person on a regular schedule. · from a complaint F-0712
The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. F-0919
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Sep 24, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make sure residents actually saw their doctor face-to-face at all required visits. Doctors must examine nursing home residents in person on a regular schedule. · from a complaint · F-0712 |
| Sep 24, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · F-0919 |
| Sep 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Sep 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Jul 15, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| May 9, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit. · F-0711 |
| May 9, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make sure residents actually saw their doctor face-to-face at all required visits. Doctors must examine nursing home residents in person on a regular schedule. · F-0712 |
| May 9, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint · F-0558 |
| May 9, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| May 9, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| May 9, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| May 9, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| May 9, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| May 9, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755 |
| Feb 9, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit. · F-0711 |
| Feb 9, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Feb 9, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · F-0908 |
| Feb 9, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have firmly secured handrails on both sides of its hallways. · F-0924 |
| Feb 9, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · F-0552 |
| Feb 9, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Feb 9, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Feb 9, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility was not properly licensed, or did not operate in compliance with federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and accepted professional standards. · F-0836 |
| Feb 9, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 5).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 9 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 9 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 6 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New Jersey avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.92 | 3.88 | 3.95 | top 34% in New Jersey; top 43% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.45 | 0.67 | 0.69 | bottom 31% in New Jersey; bottom 31% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.61 | 3.53 | 3.50 | top 33% in New Jersey; top 37% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.27 | 0.50 | 0.48 | bottom 23% in New Jersey; bottom 26% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 16.8 | 39.7 | 45.8 | top 4% in New Jersey; top 2% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 26.3 | 37.7 | 42.9 | top 30% in New Jersey; top 23% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.14, RN 0.36, weekend 2.89.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.14 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Complete Care at Orange Park. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| East Orange Holdco LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 10/19/2021 |
| Eef Capital LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 10/19/2021 |
| PC East Orange Holdco | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 10/19/2021 |
| Schlaff, Benny | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 10/19/2021 |
| Schlaff, Nachum | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 10/19/2021 |
| SMS 2021 Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 10/19/2021 |
| Stein, Shalom | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/19/2021 |
| Altema, Roosevelt | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/19/2021 |
| Clarke, Robert | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/19/2021 |
| Clarke, Robert | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/19/2021 |
| East Orange Holdco LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/19/2021 |
| East Orange Property LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/19/2021 |
| Eef Capital LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/19/2021 |
| Gottlieb, Yehuda | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/19/2021 |
| Gottlieb, Yehuda | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/19/2021 |
| Grewal, Baljinder | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/19/2021 |
| Grewal, Baljinder | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/19/2021 |
| Levovitz, Yitzchok | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/19/2021 |
| Mercado, Wanda | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/19/2022 |
| PC East Orange Holdco | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/19/2021 |
Showing 20 of 27 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 7 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Complete Care — 85 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 84 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grove Park Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center | 0.4 mi | East Orange, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Park Crescent Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center | 0.7 mi | East Orange, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Sinai Post-Acute Nursing & Rehab Center | 1.4 mi | Newark, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Job Haines Home for Aged People | 1.4 mi | Bloomfield, NJ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Broadway House for Continuing Care | 1.6 mi | Newark, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| New Vista Nursing & Rehabilitation Ctr | 1.6 mi | Newark, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 2/5 | |
| Forest Hills Center for Rehabilitation and Healing | 1.6 mi | Newark, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Axia Care Center of Orange | 1.7 mi | Orange, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| New Community Extended Care Facility | 1.7 mi | Newark, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Brookhaven Health Care Center | 1.8 mi | East Orange, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Alaris Health at Belgrove | 2.2 mi | Kearny, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| White House Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center | 2.3 mi | Orange, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Essex, NJ — 32 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315178.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details